PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
C007.DE vs. AMES.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

C007.DE vs. AMES.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MDAX ESG UCITS ETF Dist (C007.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with C007.DE having a 7.27% return and AMES.DE slightly lower at 7.00%. Over the past 10 years, C007.DE has underperformed AMES.DE with an annualized return of 4.38%, while AMES.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.05% annualized return.


C007.DE

1D
0.48%
1M
3.37%
YTD
7.27%
6M
9.42%
1Y
8.07%
3Y*
5.69%
5Y*
-0.66%
10Y*
4.38%

AMES.DE

1D
0.51%
1M
3.60%
YTD
7.00%
6M
10.82%
1Y
33.98%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
19.21%
10Y*
11.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C007.DE vs. AMES.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
C007.DE
Amundi MDAX ESG UCITS ETF Dist
7.27%17.62%-6.09%8.74%-28.15%13.79%8.23%30.77%-18.28%17.54%
AMES.DE
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR
7.00%55.41%19.00%25.94%0.03%6.96%-12.87%15.76%-12.77%11.84%

Correlation

The correlation between C007.DE and AMES.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014

0.59

The correlation between C007.DE and AMES.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

C007.DE vs. AMES.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C007.DE
C007.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
C007.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C007.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
C007.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
C007.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
C007.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

AMES.DE
AMES.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C007.DE vs. AMES.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MDAX ESG UCITS ETF Dist (C007.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


C007.DEAMES.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.37

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

3.40

-2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.72

11.80

-10.08

C007.DE vs. AMES.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C007.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C007.DE and AMES.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


C007.DEAMES.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

2.06

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

1.20

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.62

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.48

-0.18

Drawdowns

C007.DE vs. AMES.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C007.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.51%, roughly equal to the maximum AMES.DE drawdown of -40.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C007.DE and AMES.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


C007.DEAMES.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.51%

-40.98%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.84%

-9.95%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.64%

-12.58%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.33%

-17.77%

-21.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.51%

-40.98%

+1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.11%

-0.52%

-9.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.88%

-9.76%

-2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

2.87%

+1.80%

Volatility

C007.DE vs. AMES.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MDAX ESG UCITS ETF Dist (C007.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) have volatilities of 4.72% and 4.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


C007.DEAMES.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

4.59%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.96%

13.65%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.70%

16.43%

+2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.41%

18.01%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.56%

20.82%

-2.26%

C007.DE vs. AMES.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

C007.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than AMES.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

C007.DE vs. AMES.DE - Dividend Comparison

C007.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while AMES.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMES.DE
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
C007.DE
Amundi MDAX ESG UCITS ETF Dist
1.58%1.70%1.69%1.86%1.76%0.60%0.79%1.57%2.31%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


C007.DE and AMES.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMES.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMES.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for C007.DE.

C007.DE tracks MDAX® ESG+, while AMES.DE tracks MSCI Spain. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for C007.DE and 0.25% for AMES.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for C007.DE and AMES.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer