C006.DE vs. ZPRW.DE

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

C006.DE (Amundi F.A.Z. 100 UCITS ETF Dist) and ZPRW.DE (SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - C006.DE tracks the F.A.Z. while ZPRW.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Value Exposure Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, C006.DE returned 7.23%/yr vs 11.23%/yr for ZPRW.DE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. C006.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ZPRW.DE.

Performance

C006.DE vs. ZPRW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi F.A.Z. 100 UCITS ETF Dist (C006.DE) and SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (ZPRW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C006.DE achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than ZPRW.DE's 14.94% return. Over the past 10 years, C006.DE has underperformed ZPRW.DE with an annualized return of 7.23%, while ZPRW.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.23% annualized return.

C006.DE

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -0.59%
• 6M: -1.22%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 1Y: 2.25%
• 3Y*: 11.77%
• 5Y*: 6.23%
• 10Y*: 7.23%

ZPRW.DE

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 1.29%
• 6M: 11.98%
• YTD: 14.94%
• 1Y: 32.77%
• 3Y*: 20.81%
• 5Y*: 14.91%
• 10Y*: 11.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C006.DE vs. ZPRW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
C006.DE Amundi F.A.Z. 100 UCITS ETF Dist	1.44%	20.80%	13.47%	16.42%	-17.90%	15.42%	1.27%	23.17%	-18.71%	14.75%
ZPRW.DE SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF	14.94%	35.69%	8.88%	13.70%	-4.74%	27.37%	-7.65%	23.75%	-14.98%	10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between C006.DE and ZPRW.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2015	0.87

The correlation between C006.DE and ZPRW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

C006.DE vs. ZPRW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C006.DE

C006.DE Risk / Return Rank: 13
C006.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
C006.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
C006.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 12
C006.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
C006.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 14

ZPRW.DE

ZPRW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
ZPRW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
ZPRW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
ZPRW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ZPRW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
ZPRW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C006.DE vs. ZPRW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi F.A.Z. 100 UCITS ETF Dist (C006.DE) and SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (ZPRW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	C006.DE	ZPRW.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	2.38	-2.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.32	3.31	-2.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.44	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	3.52	-3.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.60	13.12	-12.52

C006.DE vs. ZPRW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C006.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the ZPRW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C006.DE and ZPRW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

C006.DE vs. ZPRW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C006.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.96%, roughly equal to the maximum ZPRW.DE drawdown of -39.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C006.DE and ZPRW.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	C006.DE	ZPRW.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.96%	-39.52%	-0.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.43%	-9.27%	-2.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.77%	-17.03%	+1.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.09%	-18.41%	-12.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.96%	-39.52%	-0.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.17%	-0.46%	-2.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.30%	-6.98%	-0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.76%	2.49%	+1.27%

Volatility

C006.DE vs. ZPRW.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi F.A.Z. 100 UCITS ETF Dist (C006.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (ZPRW.DE) at 3.73%. This indicates that C006.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPRW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	C006.DE	ZPRW.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	3.73%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.80%	11.44%	+1.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.38%	13.69%	+1.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.76%	14.88%	+1.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.37%	16.70%	+0.67%

C006.DE vs. ZPRW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

C006.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPRW.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

C006.DE vs. ZPRW.DE - Dividend Comparison

C006.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while ZPRW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
C006.DE Amundi F.A.Z. 100 UCITS ETF Dist	1.99%	2.01%	2.38%	3.75%	3.04%	1.59%	2.06%	2.41%	2.88%	0.09%
ZPRW.DE SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both C006.DE and ZPRW.DE in my portfolio?

C006.DE and ZPRW.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, C006.DE or ZPRW.DE?

On fees, C006.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, C006.DE or ZPRW.DE?

C006.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ZPRW.DE.

What is the main difference between C006.DE and ZPRW.DE?

C006.DE tracks F.A.Z., while ZPRW.DE tracks MSCI Europe Value Exposure Select. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for C006.DE and 0.20% for ZPRW.DE.