C vs. NVDY
C (Citigroup Inc.) is a stock, while NVDY (YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past 3 years, C returned 46.87%/yr vs 51.33%/yr for NVDY. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
C vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C achieves a 21.02% return, which is significantly higher than NVDY's 8.91% return.
C
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 12.68%
- YTD
- 21.02%
- 6M
- 26.32%
- 1Y
- 82.79%
- 3Y*
- 46.87%
- 5Y*
- 16.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.22%
NVDY
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -7.09%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- 36.80%
- 3Y*
- 51.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
C vs. NVDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
C Citigroup Inc. | 21.02% | 70.38% | 41.93% | 13.68% |
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 8.91% | 27.38% | 114.23% | 41.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between C and NVDY is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank
C
NVDY
C vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Citigroup Inc. (C) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| C | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.23 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.64 | 2.89 | +2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.25 | 6.79 | +9.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
C vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than NVDY's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C and NVDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.00% | -34.08% | -63.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.76% | -12.81% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.31% | -34.08% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.68% | -10.09% | -52.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -6.17% | -37.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.12% | 5.44% | -0.32% |
Volatility
C vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Citigroup Inc. (C) is 8.30%, while YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a volatility of 10.45%. This indicates that C experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.30% | 10.45% | -2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.09% | 21.66% | +1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.37% | 28.06% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.20% | 38.24% | -9.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.23% | 38.24% | -5.01% |
Dividends
C vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison
C's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than NVDY's 66.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C Citigroup Inc. | 1.72% | 1.99% | 3.10% | 4.04% | 4.51% | 3.38% | 3.31% | 2.40% | 2.96% | 1.29% | 0.71% | 0.31% |
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 66.87% | 83.10% | 83.65% | 22.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
C and NVDY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDY has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to C (8.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, C dropped -98.00% vs NVDY's -34.08%.
C currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for C and NVDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer