PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
C vs. BNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

C vs. BNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Citigroup Inc. (C) and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C achieves a 11.41% return, which is significantly lower than BNY's 36.32% return. Over the past 10 years, C has underperformed BNY with an annualized return of 14.64%, while BNY has yielded a comparatively higher 17.86% annualized return.


C

1D
-0.49%
1M
-10.02%
6M
10.13%
YTD
11.41%
1Y
40.86%
3Y*
44.52%
5Y*
17.65%
10Y*
14.64%
ALL TIME*
6.02%

BNY

1D
-0.13%
1M
9.26%
6M
30.43%
YTD
36.32%
1Y
61.76%
3Y*
55.66%
5Y*
29.20%
10Y*
17.86%
ALL TIME*
11.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C vs. BNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
C
Citigroup Inc.
11.41%70.38%41.93%18.98%-22.09%0.93%-19.70%57.82%-28.49%27.03%
BNY
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
36.32%54.45%51.90%18.52%-19.14%40.55%-12.91%9.56%-10.85%15.68%

Correlation

The correlation between C and BNY is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1977

0.50

The correlation between C and BNY shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.70 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

C:

$220.76B

BNY:

$107.71B

EPS

C:

$9.84

BNY:

$8.98

PE Ratio

C:

13.08

BNY:

17.48

PS Ratio

C:

1.52

BNY:

3.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

C:

$153.60B

BNY:

$35.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

C:

$83.82B

BNY:

$21.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

C:

$28.05B

BNY:

$9.39B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

C vs. BNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C
C Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
C Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
C Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
C Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
C Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

BNY
BNY Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNY Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNY Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C vs. BNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Citigroup Inc. (C) and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBNYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.47

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

6.12

-3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.68

17.19

-9.51

C vs. BNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the BNY Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C and BNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

C vs. BNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than BNY's maximum drawdown of -72.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C and BNY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.00%

-72.28%

-25.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.76%

-10.15%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.31%

-17.58%

-13.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.31%

-40.45%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.51%

-50.49%

-6.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.64%

-3.34%

-62.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.55%

-18.67%

-24.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.34%

3.60%

+1.74%

Volatility

C vs. BNY - Volatility Comparison

Citigroup Inc. (C) and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BNY) have volatilities of 8.56% and 8.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.56%

8.30%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.01%

17.25%

+5.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.71%

21.06%

+7.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.17%

24.50%

+4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.05%

26.89%

+6.16%

Dividends

C vs. BNY - Dividend Comparison

C's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than BNY's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNY
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
1.35%1.72%2.32%3.04%3.12%2.24%2.92%2.34%2.21%1.60%1.52%1.65%
C
Citigroup Inc.
1.86%1.99%3.10%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%

Financials

C vs. BNY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Citigroup Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
24.77B
5.70B
(C) Total Revenue
(BNY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

C vs. BNY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Citigroup Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
100.0%
Portfolio components
C - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a gross profit of 24.77B and revenue of 24.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

BNY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation reported a gross profit of 5.70B and revenue of 5.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

C - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported an operating income of 8.03B and revenue of 24.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.4%.

BNY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation reported an operating income of 2.27B and revenue of 5.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.8%.

C - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a net income of 5.83B and revenue of 24.77B, resulting in a net margin of 23.5%.

BNY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation reported a net income of 1.76B and revenue of 5.70B, resulting in a net margin of 30.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


C and BNY have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

C has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to BNY (8.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, C dropped -98.00% vs BNY's -72.28%.

BNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for C and BNY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer