BZQ vs. SARK

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BZQ (ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped) and SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BZQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Brazil 25-50 (-200%), while SARK is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS. BZQ is passively managed, while SARK is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BZQ returned -21.88%/yr vs -26.33%/yr for SARK. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BZQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SARK.

Performance

BZQ vs. SARK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped (BZQ) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BZQ achieves a -26.41% return, which is significantly lower than SARK's -6.50% return.

BZQ

• 1D: 3.58%
• 1M: -5.36%
• 6M: -18.84%
• YTD: -26.41%
• 1Y: -49.60%
• 3Y*: -21.88%
• 5Y*: -23.87%
• 10Y*: -34.51%

SARK

• 1D: 3.71%
• 1M: 2.52%
• 6M: 0.41%
• YTD: -6.50%
• 1Y: -12.55%
• 3Y*: -26.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BZQ vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BZQ ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped	-26.41%	-57.90%	98.84%	-49.11%	-44.20%	-5.03%
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF	-6.50%	-25.93%	-36.90%	-46.32%	83.35%	24.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BZQ and SARK is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021	0.32

Return for Risk

BZQ vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BZQ

BZQ Risk / Return Rank: 2
BZQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BZQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BZQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BZQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BZQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

SARK

SARK Risk / Return Rank: 6
SARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
SARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
SARK Omega Ratio Rank: 7
SARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
SARK Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BZQ vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped (BZQ) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BZQ	SARK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.00	-0.35	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.56	-0.28	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	0.97	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	-0.48	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.14	-0.84	-0.31

BZQ vs. SARK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BZQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the SARK Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BZQ and SARK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BZQ vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BZQ drawdown since its inception was -99.82%, which is greater than SARK's maximum drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BZQ and SARK.

Drawdown Indicators

	BZQ	SARK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.82%	-81.07%	-18.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.20%	-26.34%	-38.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-77.31%	-74.42%	-2.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-88.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.76%	-79.36%	-20.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.62%	-47.24%	-37.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.47%	15.03%	+28.44%

Volatility

BZQ vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped (BZQ) has a higher volatility of 12.02% compared to Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) at 8.83%. This indicates that BZQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BZQ	SARK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.02%	8.83%	+3.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.97%	26.97%	+13.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.98%	36.11%	+13.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.14%	55.89%	-0.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.57%	55.89%	+10.68%

BZQ vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BZQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BZQ vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison

BZQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.50%, more than SARK's 3.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BZQ ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped	7.50%	5.96%	3.26%	4.51%	0.22%	0.00%	0.21%	2.13%	0.28%
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF	3.01%	2.82%	15.49%	12.57%	25.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BZQ and SARK in my portfolio?

BZQ and SARK have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BZQ or SARK?

BZQ has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to SARK (8.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BZQ dropped -99.82% vs SARK's -81.07%.

Which ETF is better, BZQ or SARK?

On 3-year performance, BZQ leads with -21.88% vs -26.33% for SARK. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SARK has been the lower-risk option at 8.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BZQ or SARK?

Over the 3-year period, BZQ has performed better with a -21.88% return vs -26.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BZQ or SARK?

SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BZQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BZQ or SARK?

BZQ has the higher dividend yield at 7.50%, compared with 3.01% for SARK.

What is the main difference between BZQ and SARK?

BZQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SARK is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BZQ and 0.75% for SARK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.35 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.