PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BZQ vs. SARK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BZQ vs. SARK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped (BZQ) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BZQ vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
-35.24%-57.90%98.84%-49.11%-44.20%-2.09%
SARK
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF
8.23%-25.93%-36.90%-46.32%83.35%20.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BZQ achieves a -35.24% return, which is significantly lower than SARK's 8.23% return.


BZQ

1D
-0.31%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
-35.24%
6M
-44.95%
1Y
-62.63%
3Y*
-34.64%
5Y*
-32.43%
10Y*
-38.77%

SARK

1D
-1.21%
1M
6.96%
YTD
8.23%
6M
18.23%
1Y
-34.20%
3Y*
-28.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BZQ vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BZQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BZQ vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BZQ
BZQ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BZQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BZQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BZQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BZQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BZQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

SARK
SARK Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SARK Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
SARK Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BZQ vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped (BZQ) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BZQSARKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.22

-0.74

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.25

-0.95

-1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

0.89

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

-0.59

-0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.36

-0.73

-0.63

BZQ vs. SARK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BZQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.22, which is lower than the SARK Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BZQ and SARK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BZQSARKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.22

-0.74

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

-0.19

-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between BZQ and SARK is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BZQ vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison

BZQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.52%, more than SARK's 2.60% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
8.52%5.96%3.26%4.51%0.22%0.00%0.21%2.13%0.28%
SARK
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF
2.60%2.82%15.49%12.57%25.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BZQ vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BZQ drawdown since its inception was -99.79%, which is greater than SARK's maximum drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BZQ and SARK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BZQSARKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.79%

-81.07%

-18.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.23%

-59.44%

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.79%

-76.11%

-23.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.38%

-45.20%

-39.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.46%

47.97%

-1.51%

Volatility

BZQ vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped (BZQ) has a higher volatility of 22.43% compared to Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) at 12.41%. This indicates that BZQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BZQSARKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.43%

12.41%

+10.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.07%

27.16%

+11.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.39%

46.26%

+5.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.41%

56.94%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.40%

56.94%

+10.46%