BZH vs. NVDA
BZH (Beazer Homes USA, Inc.) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. BZH operates in Residential Construction (Consumer Cyclical), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BZH returned 13.19%/yr vs 64.62%/yr for NVDA. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BZH vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BZH achieves a 58.36% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, BZH has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 13.19%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 64.62% annualized return.
BZH
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 14.36%
- 6M
- 48.82%
- YTD
- 58.36%
- 1Y
- 47.93%
- 3Y*
- -2.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- 13.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.74%
NVDA
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 62.93%
- 5Y*
- 59.52%
- 10Y*
- 64.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 36.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.43M | $12.77M | $15.77M | |
| $25.46B | $26.13B | $31.85B |
BZH vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BZH Beazer Homes USA, Inc. | 58.36% | -26.18% | -18.73% | 164.81% | -45.05% | 53.27% | 7.22% | 49.05% | -50.65% | 44.44% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 7.77% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between BZH and NVDA is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BZH and NVDA has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
BZH:
$877.42M
NVDA:
$4.86T
BZH:
$1.03
NVDA:
$6.53
BZH:
31.13
NVDA:
30.73
BZH:
0.44
NVDA:
19.35
BZH:
0.77
NVDA:
25.05
BZH:
$2.11B
NVDA:
$253.49B
BZH:
$275.68M
NVDA:
$187.95B
BZH:
$1.64M
NVDA:
$192.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BZH vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
BZH
NVDA
BZH vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beazer Homes USA, Inc. (BZH) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BZH | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.09 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 0.65 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.44 | 1.32 | +1.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BZH vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BZH drawdown since its inception was -99.69%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BZH and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BZH | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.69% | -89.72% | -9.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.98% | -20.21% | -14.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.79% | -36.88% | -12.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.04% | -66.34% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.92% | -66.34% | -12.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.79% | -14.74% | -76.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.61% | -36.07% | -27.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.04% | 9.90% | +5.14% |
Volatility
BZH vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. (BZH) has a higher volatility of 13.90% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.04%. This indicates that BZH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BZH | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.90% | 12.04% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.32% | 28.30% | +19.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.99% | 36.41% | +21.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.66% | 51.87% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.98% | 49.95% | +5.03% |
Dividends
BZH vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
BZH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BZH Beazer Homes USA, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Financials
BZH vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Beazer Homes USA, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BZH vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
BZH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Beazer Homes USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 48.70M and revenue of 409.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
BZH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Beazer Homes USA, Inc. reported an operating income of -18.97M and revenue of 409.85M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.6%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
BZH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Beazer Homes USA, Inc. reported a net income of 32.56M and revenue of 409.85M, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BZH and NVDA have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BZH has higher volatility (13.90%) compared to NVDA (12.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BZH dropped -99.69% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
BZH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BZH and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer