BYRN vs. SFM
BYRN (Byrna Technologies Inc.) and SFM (Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.) are both stocks. BYRN operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while SFM operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, BYRN returned 10.22%/yr vs 14.32%/yr for SFM. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BYRN vs. SFM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BYRN achieves a -62.18% return, which is significantly lower than SFM's 8.36% return. Over the past 10 years, BYRN has underperformed SFM with an annualized return of 10.22%, while SFM has yielded a comparatively higher 14.32% annualized return.
BYRN
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 27.00%
- YTD
- -62.18%
- 6M
- -66.08%
- 1Y
- -79.89%
- 3Y*
- 7.86%
- 5Y*
- -23.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
SFM
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- 8.36%
- 6M
- 8.54%
- 1Y
- -45.03%
- 3Y*
- 35.31%
- 5Y*
- 24.38%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
BYRN vs. SFM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYRN Byrna Technologies Inc. | -62.18% | -41.72% | 350.86% | -18.49% | -41.27% | -7.93% | 663.16% | 26.67% | 7.14% | -30.00% |
SFM Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | 8.36% | -37.30% | 164.12% | 48.63% | 9.06% | 47.66% | 3.88% | -17.69% | -3.45% | 28.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between BYRN and SFM is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013 | 0.04 |
Fundamentals
BYRN:
$151.32M
SFM:
$8.25B
BYRN:
$0.37
SFM:
$5.20
BYRN:
17.25
SFM:
16.62
BYRN:
1.26
SFM:
0.95
BYRN:
2.28
SFM:
5.75
BYRN:
$120.98M
SFM:
$8.90B
BYRN:
$72.95M
SFM:
$3.41B
BYRN:
$12.75M
SFM:
$837.54M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BYRN vs. SFM — Risk / Return Rank
BYRN
SFM
BYRN vs. SFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) and Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BYRN | SFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.72 | 0.81 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | -0.73 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | -0.99 | -0.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BYRN vs. SFM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BYRN drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than SFM's maximum drawdown of -72.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYRN and SFM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BYRN | SFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -72.88% | -19.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.22% | -62.17% | -23.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -85.49% | -63.48% | -22.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.51% | -63.48% | -29.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.51% | -63.48% | -29.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.43% | -51.91% | -29.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.36% | -40.28% | -12.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 55.16% | 45.41% | +9.75% |
Volatility
BYRN vs. SFM - Volatility Comparison
Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) has a higher volatility of 17.02% compared to Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) at 12.50%. This indicates that BYRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BYRN | SFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.02% | 12.50% | +4.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.78% | 30.32% | +29.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.16% | 46.09% | +28.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.23% | 39.23% | +34.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.32% | 37.82% | +57.50% |
Dividends
BYRN vs. SFM - Dividend Comparison
Neither BYRN nor SFM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BYRN vs. SFM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Byrna Technologies Inc. and Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BYRN vs. SFM - Profitability Comparison
BYRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.40M and revenue of 29.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.
SFM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported a gross profit of 917.28M and revenue of 2.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.
BYRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 928.00K and revenue of 29.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
SFM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported an operating income of 215.31M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
BYRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 801.00K and revenue of 29.05M, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
SFM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported a net income of 163.72M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BYRN and SFM have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BYRN has higher volatility (17.02%) compared to SFM (12.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYRN dropped -92.51% vs SFM's -72.88%.
SFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.98 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BYRN and SFM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer