BYRN vs. PAAS
BYRN (Byrna Technologies Inc.) and PAAS (Pan American Silver Corp.) are both stocks. BYRN operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while PAAS operates in Silver (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, BYRN returned 4.88%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for PAAS. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BYRN vs. PAAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BYRN achieves a -76.98% return, which is significantly lower than PAAS's -15.21% return. Over the past 10 years, BYRN has underperformed PAAS with an annualized return of 4.88%, while PAAS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.72% annualized return.
BYRN
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- -40.08%
- 6M
- -77.79%
- YTD
- -76.98%
- 1Y
- -83.17%
- 3Y*
- -1.63%
- 5Y*
- -28.95%
- 10Y*
- 4.88%
PAAS
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- 6M
- -19.06%
- YTD
- -15.21%
- 1Y
- 45.94%
- 3Y*
- 45.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
BYRN vs. PAAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYRN Byrna Technologies Inc. | -76.98% | -41.72% | 350.86% | -18.49% | -41.27% | -7.93% | 663.16% | 26.67% | 7.14% | -30.00% |
PAAS Pan American Silver Corp. | -15.21% | 160.40% | 26.61% | 2.50% | -33.00% | -26.78% | 46.88% | 63.86% | -5.30% | 3.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between BYRN and PAAS is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2011 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
BYRN:
$87.68M
PAAS:
$18.40B
BYRN:
-$0.16
PAAS:
$3.12
BYRN:
0.84
PAAS:
4.43
BYRN:
1.54
PAAS:
2.51
BYRN:
$108.86M
PAAS:
$4.02B
BYRN:
$57.17M
PAAS:
$1.76B
BYRN:
-$3.55M
PAAS:
$2.14B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BYRN vs. PAAS — Risk / Return Rank
BYRN
PAAS
BYRN vs. PAAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) and Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BYRN | PAAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.69 | 1.19 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 1.36 | -2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.65 | 3.33 | -4.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BYRN vs. PAAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BYRN drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than PAAS's maximum drawdown of -85.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYRN and PAAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BYRN | PAAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -85.10% | -7.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.01% | -37.62% | -48.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.70% | -37.62% | -51.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.51% | -57.39% | -35.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.51% | -66.74% | -25.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.70% | -36.06% | -52.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.50% | -41.62% | -10.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.63% | 15.33% | +36.30% |
Volatility
BYRN vs. PAAS - Volatility Comparison
Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) has a higher volatility of 46.46% compared to Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) at 15.22%. This indicates that BYRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BYRN | PAAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 46.46% | 15.22% | +31.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 74.13% | 44.86% | +29.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.31% | 56.23% | +26.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.22% | 48.19% | +27.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.16% | 49.60% | +46.56% |
Dividends
BYRN vs. PAAS - Dividend Comparison
BYRN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYRN Byrna Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAAS Pan American Silver Corp. | 1.42% | 0.89% | 1.98% | 2.45% | 2.75% | 1.36% | 0.64% | 0.59% | 0.96% | 0.64% | 0.33% | 4.23% |
Financials
BYRN vs. PAAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Byrna Technologies Inc. and Pan American Silver Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BYRN vs. PAAS - Profitability Comparison
BYRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.78M and revenue of 16.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.9%.
PAAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 608.00M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.7%.
BYRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of -12.85M and revenue of 16.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -78.4%.
PAAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 560.00M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.5%.
BYRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a net income of -10.09M and revenue of 16.39M, resulting in a net margin of -61.6%.
PAAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported a net income of 457.00M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BYRN and PAAS have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BYRN has higher volatility (46.46%) compared to PAAS (15.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYRN dropped -92.51% vs PAAS's -85.10%.
PAAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BYRN and PAAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer