PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BYRN vs. IAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BYRN vs. IAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYRN achieves a -72.90% return, which is significantly lower than IAG's -13.95% return. Over the past 10 years, BYRN has underperformed IAG with an annualized return of 6.61%, while IAG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.35% annualized return.


BYRN

1D
-0.22%
1M
-33.09%
6M
-66.81%
YTD
-72.90%
1Y
-79.51%
3Y*
9.14%
5Y*
-28.29%
10Y*
6.61%
ALL TIME*
3.96%

IAG

1D
-2.54%
1M
-10.02%
6M
-21.95%
YTD
-13.95%
1Y
109.91%
3Y*
76.06%
5Y*
38.95%
10Y*
10.35%
ALL TIME*
5.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.54M$5.26M$3.58M
$76.33M$73.71M$89.43M

BYRN vs. IAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BYRN
Byrna Technologies Inc.
-72.90%-41.72%350.86%-18.49%-41.27%-7.93%663.16%26.67%7.14%-30.00%
IAG
IAMGOLD Corporation
-13.95%219.57%103.95%-1.94%-17.57%-14.71%-1.61%1.36%-36.88%51.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BYRN and IAG is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2011

0.07

The correlation between BYRN and IAG shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.18 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BYRN:

$103.25M

IAG:

$8.20B

EPS

BYRN:

-$0.16

IAG:

$1.73

PS Ratio

BYRN:

0.99

IAG:

2.43

PB Ratio

BYRN:

1.81

IAG:

1.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

BYRN:

$108.86M

IAG:

$3.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BYRN:

$57.17M

IAG:

$1.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

BYRN:

-$3.55M

IAG:

$1.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BYRN vs. IAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BYRN
BYRN Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BYRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYRN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BYRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYRN Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

IAG
IAG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAG Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BYRN vs. IAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BYRNIAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.29

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

2.55

-3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.44

5.35

-6.79

BYRN vs. IAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYRN Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the IAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYRN and IAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BYRN vs. IAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYRN drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, roughly equal to the maximum IAG drawdown of -95.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYRN and IAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BYRNIAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.51%

-95.55%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-88.49%

-43.30%

-45.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.70%

-43.30%

-47.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.51%

-73.69%

-18.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.51%

-86.46%

-6.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.69%

-42.25%

-44.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.64%

-56.07%

+3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.21%

20.61%

+34.60%

Volatility

BYRN vs. IAG - Volatility Comparison

Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) has a higher volatility of 50.27% compared to IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) at 15.14%. This indicates that BYRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BYRNIAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

50.27%

15.14%

+35.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.46%

48.40%

+29.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.35%

62.98%

+19.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.62%

60.60%

+15.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.48%

58.53%

+37.95%

Dividends

BYRN vs. IAG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BYRN nor IAG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BYRN vs. IAG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Byrna Technologies Inc. and IAMGOLD Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

BYRN vs. IAG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Byrna Technologies Inc. and IAMGOLD Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

BYRN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.78M and revenue of 16.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.9%.

IAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 570.70M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.

BYRN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of -12.85M and revenue of 16.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -78.4%.

IAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 544.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.9%.

BYRN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a net income of -10.09M and revenue of 16.39M, resulting in a net margin of -61.6%.

IAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 379.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BYRN and IAG have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BYRN has higher volatility (50.27%) compared to IAG (15.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYRN dropped -92.51% vs IAG's -95.55%.

IAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BYRN and IAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer