PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BYRN vs. ELMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BYRN vs. ELMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) and Electromed, Inc. (ELMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYRN achieves a -62.18% return, which is significantly lower than ELMD's 27.54% return. Over the past 10 years, BYRN has underperformed ELMD with an annualized return of 10.22%, while ELMD has yielded a comparatively higher 24.27% annualized return.


BYRN

1D
-1.55%
1M
27.00%
YTD
-62.18%
6M
-66.08%
1Y
-79.89%
3Y*
7.86%
5Y*
-23.39%
10Y*
10.22%

ELMD

1D
-1.25%
1M
9.14%
YTD
27.54%
6M
24.42%
1Y
85.61%
3Y*
47.60%
5Y*
27.88%
10Y*
24.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BYRN vs. ELMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BYRN
Byrna Technologies Inc.
-62.18%-41.72%350.86%-18.49%-41.27%-7.93%663.16%26.67%7.14%-30.00%
ELMD
Electromed, Inc.
27.54%-1.46%170.85%4.00%-19.31%32.52%13.41%69.94%-16.14%56.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BYRN and ELMD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2011

0.06

The correlation between BYRN and ELMD shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BYRN:

$151.32M

ELMD:

$321.18M

EPS

BYRN:

$0.37

ELMD:

$1.16

PE Ratio

BYRN:

17.25

ELMD:

31.92

PS Ratio

BYRN:

1.26

ELMD:

4.50

PB Ratio

BYRN:

2.28

ELMD:

6.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

BYRN:

$120.98M

ELMD:

$71.75M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BYRN:

$72.95M

ELMD:

$56.28M

EBITDA (TTM)

BYRN:

$12.75M

ELMD:

$14.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BYRN vs. ELMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYRN
BYRN Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BYRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYRN Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BYRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYRN Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

ELMD
ELMD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ELMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELMD Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ELMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELMD Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYRN vs. ELMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) and Electromed, Inc. (ELMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BYRNELMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.72

1.32

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

3.70

-4.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.45

7.48

-8.92

BYRN vs. ELMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYRN Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is lower than the ELMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYRN and ELMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BYRN vs. ELMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYRN drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than ELMD's maximum drawdown of -78.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYRN and ELMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BYRNELMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.51%

-78.65%

-13.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.22%

-23.27%

-61.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-85.49%

-48.86%

-36.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.51%

-48.86%

-43.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.51%

-55.84%

-36.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.43%

-5.47%

-75.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.36%

-33.86%

-18.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.16%

11.49%

+43.67%

Volatility

BYRN vs. ELMD - Volatility Comparison

Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) has a higher volatility of 17.02% compared to Electromed, Inc. (ELMD) at 13.66%. This indicates that BYRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ELMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BYRNELMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.02%

13.66%

+3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.78%

37.53%

+22.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.16%

52.64%

+21.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.23%

46.29%

+26.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.32%

52.97%

+42.35%

Dividends

BYRN vs. ELMD - Dividend Comparison

Neither BYRN nor ELMD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BYRN vs. ELMD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Byrna Technologies Inc. and Electromed, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00M15.00M20.00M25.00M30.00M35.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
29.05M
18.58M
(BYRN) Total Revenue
(ELMD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BYRN vs. ELMD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Byrna Technologies Inc. and Electromed, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
59.9%
78.8%
Portfolio components
BYRN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.40M and revenue of 29.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.

ELMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Electromed, Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.64M and revenue of 18.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.8%.

BYRN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 928.00K and revenue of 29.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

ELMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Electromed, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.77M and revenue of 18.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.

BYRN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 801.00K and revenue of 29.05M, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.

ELMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Electromed, Inc. reported a net income of 3.00M and revenue of 18.58M, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BYRN and ELMD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BYRN has higher volatility (17.02%) compared to ELMD (13.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYRN dropped -92.51% vs ELMD's -78.65%.

ELMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BYRN and ELMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer