BYRN vs. ASM
BYRN (Byrna Technologies Inc.) and ASM (Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.) are both stocks. BYRN operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while ASM operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, BYRN returned 6.61%/yr vs 7.19%/yr for ASM. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BYRN vs. ASM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BYRN achieves a -72.90% return, which is significantly lower than ASM's -13.62% return. Over the past 10 years, BYRN has underperformed ASM with an annualized return of 6.61%, while ASM has yielded a comparatively higher 7.19% annualized return.
BYRN
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -33.09%
- 6M
- -66.81%
- YTD
- -72.90%
- 1Y
- -79.51%
- 3Y*
- 9.14%
- 5Y*
- -28.29%
- 10Y*
- 6.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.96%
ASM
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- -15.65%
- 6M
- -40.33%
- YTD
- -13.62%
- 1Y
- 68.16%
- 3Y*
- 95.22%
- 5Y*
- 38.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.80M | $17.78M | $25.63M | |
| $4.54M | $5.26M | $3.58M |
BYRN vs. ASM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYRN Byrna Technologies Inc. | -72.90% | -41.72% | 350.86% | -18.49% | -41.27% | -7.93% | 663.16% | 26.67% | 7.14% | -30.00% |
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | -13.62% | 604.88% | 68.13% | -22.95% | -21.01% | -33.77% | 124.14% | -4.92% | -54.48% | -2.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between BYRN and ASM is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2011 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
BYRN:
$103.25M
ASM:
$907.17M
BYRN:
-$0.16
ASM:
$0.22
BYRN:
0.99
ASM:
7.95
BYRN:
1.81
ASM:
3.35
BYRN:
$108.86M
ASM:
$110.70M
BYRN:
$57.17M
ASM:
$59.09M
BYRN:
-$3.55M
ASM:
$55.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BYRN vs. ASM — Risk / Return Rank
BYRN
ASM
BYRN vs. ASM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BYRN | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.19 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 1.30 | -2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.44 | 2.33 | -3.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BYRN vs. ASM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BYRN drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, roughly equal to the maximum ASM drawdown of -94.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYRN and ASM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BYRN | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -94.10% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -88.49% | -52.81% | -35.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.70% | -52.81% | -37.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.51% | -60.20% | -32.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.51% | -90.00% | -2.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.69% | -52.27% | -34.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.64% | -63.65% | +11.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 55.21% | 29.32% | +25.89% |
Volatility
BYRN vs. ASM - Volatility Comparison
Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) has a higher volatility of 50.27% compared to Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) at 22.56%. This indicates that BYRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BYRN | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 50.27% | 22.56% | +27.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.46% | 63.44% | +14.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.35% | 82.98% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.62% | 66.60% | +9.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.48% | 69.91% | +26.57% |
Dividends
BYRN vs. ASM - Dividend Comparison
BYRN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | 0.68% |
BYRN Byrna Technologies Inc. | 0.00% |
Financials
BYRN vs. ASM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Byrna Technologies Inc. and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BYRN vs. ASM - Profitability Comparison
BYRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.78M and revenue of 16.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.9%.
ASM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a gross profit of 25.51M and revenue of 41.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
BYRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of -12.85M and revenue of 16.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -78.4%.
ASM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported an operating income of 21.76M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.5%.
BYRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a net income of -10.09M and revenue of 16.39M, resulting in a net margin of -61.6%.
ASM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a net income of 15.69M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BYRN and ASM have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BYRN has higher volatility (50.27%) compared to ASM (22.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYRN dropped -92.51% vs ASM's -94.10%.
ASM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BYRN and ASM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer