PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BYRE vs. PDBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BYRE vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF (BYRE) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYRE achieves a 13.39% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 24.08% return.


BYRE

1D
0.62%
1M
-0.40%
6M
12.31%
YTD
13.39%
1Y
10.98%
3Y*
8.89%
5Y*
10Y*

PDBC

1D
0.12%
1M
-3.63%
6M
21.24%
YTD
24.08%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
9.96%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
7.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BYRE vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BYRE
Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF
13.39%2.35%4.18%10.82%-9.22%
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
24.08%5.96%2.09%-6.25%-10.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BYRE and PDBC is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022

0.04

The correlation between BYRE and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BYRE vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYRE
BYRE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BYRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BYRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

PDBC
PDBC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PDBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYRE vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF (BYRE) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BYREPDBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.27

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

1.75

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.57

6.25

-2.68

BYRE vs. PDBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the PDBC Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYRE and PDBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BYRE vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYRE drawdown since its inception was -25.70%, smaller than the maximum PDBC drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYRE and PDBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BYREPDBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.70%

-49.52%

+23.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.76%

-16.55%

+8.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.20%

-16.55%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-13.06%

+11.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-23.11%

+13.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

4.64%

-1.56%

Volatility

BYRE vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF (BYRE) is 4.16%, while Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that BYRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BYREPDBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

5.48%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

16.59%

-6.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.94%

18.72%

-5.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.04%

19.19%

-1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

17.75%

+0.29%

BYRE vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BYRE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

BYRE vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison

BYRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than PDBC's 3.09% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BYRE
Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF
2.72%2.71%2.31%2.63%1.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
3.09%3.84%4.42%4.21%13.05%50.83%0.01%1.40%1.00%3.83%6.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


BYRE and PDBC have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDBC has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to BYRE (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYRE dropped -25.70% vs PDBC's -49.52%.

On 3-year performance, PDBC leads with 9.96% vs 8.89% for BYRE. On fees, PDBC is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BYRE has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PDBC has performed better with a 9.96% return vs 8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PDBC is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BYRE.

PDBC has the higher dividend yield at 3.09%, compared with 2.72% for BYRE.

BYRE is categorized as REIT, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BYRE and 0.58% for PDBC.

PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BYRE and PDBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer