PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BYLD vs. SPHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BYLD vs. SPHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD) and SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYLD achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than SPHY's 1.76% return. Over the past 10 years, BYLD has underperformed SPHY with an annualized return of 3.03%, while SPHY has yielded a comparatively higher 5.17% annualized return.


BYLD

1D
0.08%
1M
0.49%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.62%
1Y
7.32%
3Y*
6.56%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
3.03%

SPHY

1D
0.09%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.76%
6M
2.28%
1Y
7.62%
3Y*
9.04%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
5.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BYLD vs. SPHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BYLD
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF
1.41%8.41%4.17%8.30%-10.33%-1.25%4.25%12.79%-1.50%4.75%
SPHY
SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF
1.76%8.59%8.54%12.81%-10.57%5.61%6.65%13.16%-3.35%7.35%

Correlation

The correlation between BYLD and SPHY is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2014

0.46

Over the past year, BYLD and SPHY have become more correlated (0.68) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.

BYLD vs. SPHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BYLD
SPHY

Energy

99.2%
0.1%

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

99.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

BYLD
99.2%
SPHY
0.1%

Real Estate

BYLD
0.8%
SPHY

-

Basic Materials

BYLD

-

SPHY

-

Communication Services

BYLD

-

SPHY

-

Consumer Cyclical

BYLD

-

SPHY

-

Consumer Defensive

BYLD

-

SPHY

-

Financial Services

BYLD

-

SPHY
99.9%

Healthcare

BYLD

-

SPHY

-

Industrials

BYLD

-

SPHY

-

Technology

BYLD

-

SPHY

-

Utilities

BYLD

-

SPHY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BYLD vs. SPHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYLD
BYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
BYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHY
SPHY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYLD vs. SPHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD) and SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BYLDSPHYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.93

2.08

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.88

3.17

-0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.42

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

3.15

-0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.73

14.32

-3.59

BYLD vs. SPHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the SPHY Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYLD and SPHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BYLDSPHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

2.08

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.63

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.66

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.64

-0.06

Drawdowns

BYLD vs. SPHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYLD drawdown since its inception was -14.75%, smaller than the maximum SPHY drawdown of -21.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYLD and SPHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BYLDSPHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.75%

-21.97%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-2.41%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.94%

-4.85%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.65%

-15.29%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.75%

-21.97%

+7.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.01%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-2.29%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

0.53%

+0.14%

Volatility

BYLD vs. SPHY - Volatility Comparison

iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) at 1.16%. This indicates that BYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BYLDSPHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

1.16%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.96%

2.91%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

3.67%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.20%

7.17%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.43%

7.89%

-2.46%

BYLD vs. SPHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BYLD has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHY's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BYLD vs. SPHY - Dividend Comparison

BYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, less than SPHY's 7.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BYLD
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF
5.80%5.32%5.31%4.45%3.39%2.18%3.41%3.67%4.22%3.22%3.14%3.37%
SPHY
SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF
7.25%7.38%7.80%7.30%6.47%5.13%5.63%5.73%4.09%4.41%4.27%4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


BYLD and SPHY have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BYLD has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to SPHY (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYLD dropped -14.75% vs SPHY's -21.97%.

On 10-year performance, SPHY leads with 5.17% vs 3.03% for BYLD. On fees, SPHY is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SPHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHY has performed better with a 5.17% return vs 3.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHY is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for BYLD.

SPHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.25%, compared with 5.80% for BYLD.

BYLD is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while SPHY is High Yield Bonds. BYLD tracks Morningstar U.S. Bond Market Yield-Optimized Index, while SPHY tracks ICE BofAML US High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for BYLD and 0.10% for SPHY.

SPHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BYLD and SPHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer