BX vs. DECK
BX (Blackstone Inc.) and DECK (Deckers Outdoor Corporation) are both stocks. BX operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while DECK operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, BX returned 22.59%/yr vs 28.83%/yr for DECK. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BX vs. DECK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BX achieves a -18.67% return, which is significantly lower than DECK's 9.80% return. Over the past 10 years, BX has underperformed DECK with an annualized return of 22.59%, while DECK has yielded a comparatively higher 28.83% annualized return.
BX
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- -18.67%
- 6M
- -17.07%
- 1Y
- -6.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.83%
- 10Y*
- 22.59%
DECK
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 21.67%
- YTD
- 9.80%
- 6M
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- 12.17%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 28.83%
BX vs. DECK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BX Blackstone Inc. | -18.67% | -7.84% | 35.07% | 82.75% | -40.01% | 107.11% | 19.78% | 96.33% | 0.10% | 27.34% |
DECK Deckers Outdoor Corporation | 9.80% | -48.95% | 82.30% | 67.46% | 8.97% | 27.73% | 69.83% | 31.97% | 59.44% | 44.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between BX and DECK is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2007 | 0.37 |
Fundamentals
BX:
$96.22B
DECK:
$16.11B
BX:
$3.90
DECK:
$6.98
BX:
31.45
DECK:
16.31
BX:
11.56
DECK:
0.59
BX:
6.41
DECK:
3.05
BX:
11.50
DECK:
6.44
BX:
$14.99B
DECK:
$5.47B
BX:
$13.12B
DECK:
$3.16B
BX:
$7.37B
DECK:
$1.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BX vs. DECK — Risk / Return Rank
BX
DECK
BX vs. DECK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Inc. (BX) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BX | DECK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.06 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 0.16 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 0.34 | -0.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BX vs. DECK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BX drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, smaller than the maximum DECK drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BX and DECK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BX | DECK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.09% | -94.36% | +6.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.76% | -35.81% | -8.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.50% | -64.35% | +17.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.29% | -64.35% | +15.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.29% | -64.35% | +15.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.07% | -48.98% | +13.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.39% | -40.35% | +13.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.20% | 16.87% | +7.33% |
Volatility
BX vs. DECK - Volatility Comparison
Blackstone Inc. (BX) has a higher volatility of 12.67% compared to Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) at 10.35%. This indicates that BX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DECK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BX | DECK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.67% | 10.35% | +2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.51% | 31.08% | -2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.98% | 45.42% | -10.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.41% | 43.98% | -4.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.79% | 42.47% | -6.68% |
Dividends
BX vs. DECK - Dividend Comparison
BX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, while DECK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BX Blackstone Inc. | 4.05% | 3.04% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 6.66% | 2.76% | 2.95% | 3.43% | 8.12% | 7.25% | 6.14% | 11.76% |
DECK Deckers Outdoor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BX vs. DECK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blackstone Inc. and Deckers Outdoor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BX vs. DECK - Profitability Comparison
BX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blackstone Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.04B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.5%.
DECK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a gross profit of 644.64M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.
BX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blackstone Inc. reported an operating income of 1.59B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.8%.
DECK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported an operating income of 156.73M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
BX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blackstone Inc. reported a net income of 649.73M and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.
DECK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a net income of 135.57M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BX and DECK have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BX has higher volatility (12.67%) compared to DECK (10.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BX dropped -88.09% vs DECK's -94.36%.
DECK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BX and DECK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer