BWTG vs. BUFX
BWTG (Brendan Wood TopGun ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BWTG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Brendan Wood, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BWTG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
BWTG vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWTG achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.10% return.
BWTG
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 4.13%
- YTD
- 5.71%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BWTG vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BWTG Brendan Wood TopGun ETF | 5.71% | 11.32% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 4.10% | 5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BWTG and BUFX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BWTG vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
BWTG
BUFX
BWTG vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brendan Wood TopGun ETF (BWTG) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BWTG | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.45 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BWTG | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 2.68 | -1.08 |
Drawdowns
BWTG vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWTG drawdown since its inception was -13.18%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWTG and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWTG | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.18% | -2.87% | -10.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.07% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -0.24% | -1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | — | — |
Volatility
BWTG vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BWTG | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.58% | 3.98% | +7.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 3.98% | +9.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 3.98% | +9.99% |
BWTG vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BWTG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
BWTG vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
BWTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BWTG Brendan Wood TopGun ETF | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.25% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BWTG and BUFX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BWTG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BWTG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
BWTG has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
BWTG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Brendan Wood and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BWTG and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for BWTG and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer