PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BVPIX vs. NQCRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BVPIX vs. NQCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baywood ValuePlus Fund (BVPIX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BVPIX achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly lower than NQCRX's 20.39% return. Over the past 10 years, BVPIX has underperformed NQCRX with an annualized return of 10.74%, while NQCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.50% annualized return.


BVPIX

1D
-0.73%
1M
2.03%
6M
5.51%
YTD
10.28%
1Y
16.14%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
10.74%
ALL TIME*
9.52%

NQCRX

1D
1.20%
1M
0.90%
6M
14.65%
YTD
20.39%
1Y
34.51%
3Y*
21.61%
5Y*
15.22%
10Y*
14.50%
ALL TIME*
8.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BVPIX vs. NQCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BVPIX
Baywood ValuePlus Fund
10.28%12.27%12.88%11.31%4.22%22.02%0.56%23.52%-10.27%16.15%
NQCRX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund
20.39%22.44%17.74%13.76%-1.07%25.38%-0.27%47.63%-15.47%15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BVPIX and NQCRX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.92

Over the past year, the correlation between BVPIX and NQCRX has dropped to 0.71 - well below their long-term average of 0.92, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BVPIX vs. NQCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BVPIX
BVPIX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
BVPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BVPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
BVPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
BVPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BVPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

NQCRX
NQCRX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NQCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NQCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BVPIX vs. NQCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baywood ValuePlus Fund (BVPIX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BVPIXNQCRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.44

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

5.37

-3.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

20.17

-15.10

BVPIX vs. NQCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BVPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the NQCRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BVPIX and NQCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BVPIX vs. NQCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVPIX drawdown since its inception was -40.06%, smaller than the maximum NQCRX drawdown of -57.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVPIX and NQCRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BVPIXNQCRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.06%

-57.85%

+17.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-6.07%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.32%

-17.21%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.08%

-17.61%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.06%

-41.84%

+1.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-0.30%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-9.93%

+5.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

1.62%

+1.18%

Volatility

BVPIX vs. NQCRX - Volatility Comparison

Baywood ValuePlus Fund (BVPIX) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) at 3.10%. This indicates that BVPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NQCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BVPIXNQCRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

3.10%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

9.74%

-1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.77%

12.69%

-1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.82%

15.54%

-1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

18.80%

-1.46%

BVPIX vs. NQCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVPIX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than NQCRX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

BVPIX vs. NQCRX - Dividend Comparison

BVPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than NQCRX's 6.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BVPIX
Baywood ValuePlus Fund
7.27%7.85%5.54%5.95%4.41%10.20%1.96%3.35%7.83%4.68%3.73%16.80%
NQCRX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund
6.07%7.30%6.82%2.22%4.63%20.85%17.95%26.88%34.12%27.42%10.74%61.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BVPIX and NQCRX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BVPIX has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to NQCRX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BVPIX dropped -40.06% vs NQCRX's -57.85%.

NQCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BVPIX and NQCRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer