PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BVPIX vs. AUXFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BVPIX vs. AUXFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baywood ValuePlus Fund (BVPIX) and Auxier Focus Fund (AUXFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BVPIX achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly lower than AUXFX's 11.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BVPIX having a 10.74% annualized return and AUXFX not far behind at 10.25%.


BVPIX

1D
-0.73%
1M
2.03%
6M
5.51%
YTD
10.28%
1Y
16.14%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
10.74%
ALL TIME*
9.52%

AUXFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.14%
6M
9.31%
YTD
11.54%
1Y
21.19%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
9.40%
10Y*
10.25%
ALL TIME*
7.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BVPIX vs. AUXFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BVPIX
Baywood ValuePlus Fund
10.28%12.27%12.88%11.31%4.22%22.02%0.56%23.52%-10.27%16.15%
AUXFX
Auxier Focus Fund
11.54%15.23%11.31%9.76%-4.52%20.03%6.04%20.20%-4.13%17.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BVPIX and AUXFX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.89

The correlation between BVPIX and AUXFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BVPIX vs. AUXFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BVPIX
BVPIX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
BVPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BVPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
BVPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
BVPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BVPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

AUXFX
AUXFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AUXFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUXFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUXFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AUXFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUXFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BVPIX vs. AUXFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baywood ValuePlus Fund (BVPIX) and Auxier Focus Fund (AUXFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BVPIXAUXFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.41

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

3.65

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

12.93

-7.86

BVPIX vs. AUXFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BVPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the AUXFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BVPIX and AUXFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BVPIX vs. AUXFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVPIX drawdown since its inception was -40.06%, roughly equal to the maximum AUXFX drawdown of -39.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVPIX and AUXFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BVPIXAUXFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.06%

-39.82%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-5.42%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.32%

-9.30%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.08%

-15.73%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.06%

-33.69%

-6.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-0.50%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-4.40%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

1.53%

+1.27%

Volatility

BVPIX vs. AUXFX - Volatility Comparison

Baywood ValuePlus Fund (BVPIX) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Auxier Focus Fund (AUXFX) at 2.69%. This indicates that BVPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUXFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BVPIXAUXFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

2.69%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

6.68%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.77%

8.86%

+1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.82%

12.15%

+1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

15.14%

+2.20%

BVPIX vs. AUXFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVPIX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than AUXFX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

BVPIX vs. AUXFX - Dividend Comparison

BVPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than AUXFX's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUXFX
Auxier Focus Fund
2.54%2.84%3.41%4.38%3.02%2.49%2.36%6.03%6.82%5.52%2.77%5.76%
BVPIX
Baywood ValuePlus Fund
7.27%7.85%5.54%5.95%4.41%10.20%1.96%3.35%7.83%4.68%3.73%16.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


BVPIX and AUXFX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BVPIX has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to AUXFX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BVPIX dropped -40.06% vs AUXFX's -39.82%.

AUXFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BVPIX and AUXFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer