PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BVAL vs. VMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BVAL vs. VMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BVAL achieves a 14.62% return, which is significantly lower than VMAX's 18.73% return.


BVAL

1D
0.76%
1M
1.22%
6M
10.01%
YTD
14.62%
1Y
25.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.29%

VMAX

1D
0.57%
1M
2.72%
6M
13.64%
YTD
18.73%
1Y
31.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$658.39K$641.04K$1.02M
$16.61K$9.61K$6.33K

BVAL vs. VMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BVAL
Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF
14.62%12.09%
VMAX
Hartford US Value ETF
18.73%13.09%

Correlation

The correlation between BVAL and VMAX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025

0.90

The correlation between BVAL and VMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

BVAL vs. VMAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BVAL
VMAX

Technology

23.6%
13.8%

Financial Services

16.3%
33.8%

Industrials

11.8%
5.4%

Healthcare

11.2%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
3.6%

Energy

5.8%
9.8%

Communication Services

4.9%
5.9%

Utilities

4.0%
5.4%

Real Estate

3.5%
4.8%

Basic Materials

2.9%
2.4%

Technology

BVAL
23.6%
VMAX
13.8%

Financial Services

BVAL
16.3%
VMAX
33.8%

Industrials

BVAL
11.8%
VMAX
5.4%

Healthcare

BVAL
11.2%
VMAX
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BVAL
8.5%
VMAX
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

BVAL
7.6%
VMAX
3.6%

Energy

BVAL
5.8%
VMAX
9.8%

Communication Services

BVAL
4.9%
VMAX
5.9%

Utilities

BVAL
4.0%
VMAX
5.4%

Real Estate

BVAL
3.5%
VMAX
4.8%

Basic Materials

BVAL
2.9%
VMAX
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BVAL vs. VMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BVAL
BVAL Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
BVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VMAX
VMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BVAL vs. VMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BVALVMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.47

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

6.35

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.14

23.40

-7.26

BVAL vs. VMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the VMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BVAL and VMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BVAL vs. VMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVAL drawdown since its inception was -6.69%, smaller than the maximum VMAX drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVAL and VMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BVALVMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-19.05%

+12.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-4.93%

-1.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.86%

-2.43%

+1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

1.33%

+0.25%

Volatility

BVAL vs. VMAX - Volatility Comparison

Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) have volatilities of 2.59% and 2.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BVALVMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

2.51%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.90%

8.30%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.33%

11.99%

-1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.18%

15.17%

-4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.18%

15.17%

-4.99%

BVAL vs. VMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVAL has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than VMAX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

BVAL vs. VMAX - Dividend Comparison

BVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than VMAX's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BVAL
Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF
1.30%0.73%0.00%
VMAX
Hartford US Value ETF
1.82%2.14%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


BVAL and VMAX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BVAL has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to VMAX (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BVAL dropped -6.69% vs VMAX's -19.05%.

On 1-year performance, VMAX leads with 31.16% vs 25.50% for BVAL. On fees, BVAL is cheaper at 0.24% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VMAX has performed better with a 31.16% return vs 25.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BVAL is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VMAX.

VMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.30% for BVAL.

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BVAL and 0.29% for VMAX.

VMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BVAL and VMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer