BVAL vs. PRXV
BVAL (Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF) and PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BVAL charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for PRXV.
Performance
BVAL vs. PRXV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BVAL
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- YTD
- 11.47%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRXV
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BVAL vs. PRXV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF | 4.66% |
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 4.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between BVAL and PRXV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BVAL vs. PRXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BVAL | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.55 | 4.54 | -2.00 |
Drawdowns
BVAL vs. PRXV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BVAL drawdown since its inception was -6.69%, which is greater than PRXV's maximum drawdown of -1.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVAL and PRXV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BVAL | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -1.18% | -5.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.03% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.91% | -0.32% | -0.59% |
Volatility
BVAL vs. PRXV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BVAL | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.13% | 9.66% | +0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.13% | 9.66% | +0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.13% | 9.66% | +0.47% |
BVAL vs. PRXV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BVAL has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than PRXV's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
BVAL vs. PRXV - Dividend Comparison
BVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, while PRXV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF | 0.97% | 0.73% |
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, BVAL and PRXV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BVAL is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BVAL is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for PRXV.
BVAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for PRXV.
They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Praxis. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BVAL and 0.36% for PRXV.
Find the right allocation for BVAL and PRXV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer