BVAL vs. BGIG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BVAL (Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF) and BGIG (Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BVAL charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BGIG.

Performance

BVAL vs. BGIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BVAL achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly higher than BGIG's 9.84% return.

BVAL

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 4.10%
• YTD: 11.47%
• 6M: 11.85%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BGIG

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: 9.84%
• 6M: 9.56%
• 1Y: 19.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BVAL vs. BGIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF	11.47%	11.38%
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF	9.84%	8.95%

Correlation

The correlation between BVAL and BGIG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.82

BVAL vs. BGIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BVAL	BGIG
Technology	20.1%	24.6%
Financial Services	16.9%	14.8%
Industrials	11.8%	10.6%
Healthcare	11.1%	14.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	5.4%
Consumer Defensive	8.2%	6.9%
Energy	6.8%	11.2%
Communication Services	5.2%	-
Utilities	4.3%	7.9%
Real Estate	3.5%	3.5%
Basic Materials	3.1%	0.6%

Return for Risk

BVAL vs. BGIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGIG

BGIG Risk / Return Rank: 68
BGIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BGIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
BGIG Omega Ratio Rank: 65
BGIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BGIG Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BVAL vs. BGIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BVAL	BGIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.55	1.38	+1.16

Drawdowns

BVAL vs. BGIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVAL drawdown since its inception was -6.69%, smaller than the maximum BGIG drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVAL and BGIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BVAL	BGIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.69%	-13.24%	+6.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-0.28%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.91%	-1.70%	+0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BVAL	BGIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.57%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.72%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.13%	9.00%	+1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.13%	11.94%	-1.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.13%	11.94%	-1.81%

BVAL vs. BGIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVAL has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than BGIG's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

BVAL vs. BGIG - Dividend Comparison

BVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than BGIG's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF	1.75%	1.89%	2.02%	0.78%
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF	0.97%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BVAL and BGIG in my portfolio?

BVAL and BGIG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BVAL or BGIG?

On fees, BVAL is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BVAL or BGIG?

BVAL is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for BGIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BVAL or BGIG?

BGIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.97% for BVAL.

What is the main difference between BVAL and BGIG?

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Bahl & Gaynor. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BVAL and 0.45% for BGIG.