PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUZZ vs. LUNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUZZ vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUZZ achieves a 13.20% return, which is significantly lower than LUNR's 64.02% return.


BUZZ

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
13.20%
6M
9.20%
1Y
31.99%
3Y*
31.61%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*

LUNR

1D
-13.12%
1M
-25.39%
YTD
64.02%
6M
122.39%
1Y
144.44%
3Y*
42.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUZZ vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
13.20%30.61%33.74%54.64%-47.67%-12.57%
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
64.02%-10.63%610.76%-74.45%3.73%-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between BUZZ and LUNR is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

0.35

Over the past year, BUZZ and LUNR have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUZZ vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUZZ
BUZZ Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BUZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BUZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

LUNR
LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUZZ vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUZZLUNRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.26

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

3.47

-2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.54

7.12

-4.58

BUZZ vs. LUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUZZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the LUNR Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUZZ and LUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUZZ vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUZZ drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, smaller than the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUZZ and LUNR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUZZLUNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.87%

-97.43%

+40.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.47%

-41.94%

+11.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.47%

-78.54%

+48.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.85%

-67.53%

+57.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.91%

-63.21%

+39.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.65%

20.37%

-7.72%

Volatility

BUZZ vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) is 12.00%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 42.95%. This indicates that BUZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUZZLUNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.00%

42.95%

-30.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.17%

93.42%

-68.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.59%

111.16%

-78.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.19%

171.29%

-138.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.88%

171.29%

-138.41%

Dividends

BUZZ vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUZZ nor LUNR has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
0.00%0.00%0.50%0.52%0.40%
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUZZ and LUNR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUNR has higher volatility (42.95%) compared to BUZZ (12.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUZZ dropped -56.87% vs LUNR's -97.43%.

LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUZZ and LUNR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer