BUYZ vs. ICDU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICDU.L).
BUYZ and ICDU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BUYZ is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020. ICDU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Discretionary Index. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015.
Performance
BUYZ vs. ICDU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BUYZ vs. ICDU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | -19.67% | 8.70% | 28.25% | 39.13% | -49.81% | -19.38% | 111.45% |
ICDU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -8.23% | 6.72% | 30.84% | 42.88% | -37.19% | 24.83% | 44.30% |
Different Trading Currencies
BUYZ is traded in USD, while ICDU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ICDU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUYZ achieves a -19.67% return, which is significantly lower than ICDU.L's -8.23% return.
BUYZ
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -4.51%
- YTD
- -19.67%
- 6M
- -25.92%
- 1Y
- -6.83%
- 3Y*
- 10.31%
- 5Y*
- -8.54%
- 10Y*
- —
ICDU.L
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- -8.23%
- 6M
- -7.54%
- 1Y
- 11.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BUYZ vs. ICDU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUYZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ICDU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BUYZ vs. ICDU.L — Risk / Return Rank
BUYZ
ICDU.L
BUYZ vs. ICDU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICDU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUYZ | ICDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | 0.57 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | 0.95 | -1.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.12 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 0.72 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 2.44 | -2.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUYZ | ICDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | 0.57 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | 0.30 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.55 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between BUYZ and ICDU.L is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BUYZ vs. ICDU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BUYZ nor ICDU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% |
ICDU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BUYZ vs. ICDU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUYZ drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than ICDU.L's maximum drawdown of -40.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYZ and ICDU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUYZ | ICDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.04% | -33.84% | -34.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.85% | -14.03% | -16.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.32% | -33.84% | -29.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.15% | -12.13% | -36.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.60% | -7.69% | -30.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.97% | 4.66% | +7.31% |
Volatility
BUYZ vs. ICDU.L - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) has a higher volatility of 8.02% compared to iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICDU.L) at 7.07%. This indicates that BUYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICDU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BUYZ | ICDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.02% | 7.07% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.24% | 12.59% | +5.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.11% | 21.25% | +5.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.45% | 22.23% | +5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.17% | 20.72% | +9.45% |