PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUT.L vs. SEDY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUT.L vs. SEDY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Brunner Investment Trust (BUT.L) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUT.L achieves a 3.93% return, which is significantly lower than SEDY.L's 10.72% return. Over the past 10 years, BUT.L has outperformed SEDY.L with an annualized return of 13.36%, while SEDY.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.20% annualized return.


BUT.L

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
3.93%
6M
5.40%
1Y
7.57%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
13.36%

SEDY.L

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
10.72%
6M
10.19%
1Y
29.05%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
5.46%
10Y*
8.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUT.L vs. SEDY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUT.L
Brunner Investment Trust
3.93%-1.01%24.71%20.20%-6.09%31.65%-3.13%34.38%-8.17%30.61%
SEDY.L
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF
10.72%18.69%8.71%13.01%-22.64%12.64%-5.85%10.44%0.26%14.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BUT.L and SEDY.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2011

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUT.L vs. SEDY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUT.L
BUT.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BUT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BUT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SEDY.L
SEDY.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SEDY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEDY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEDY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SEDY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEDY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUT.L vs. SEDY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brunner Investment Trust (BUT.L) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUT.LSEDY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.45

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

5.95

-5.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.46

15.57

-13.11

BUT.L vs. SEDY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the SEDY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUT.L and SEDY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUT.LSEDY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

2.53

-1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.37

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.51

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.29

+0.16

Drawdowns

BUT.L vs. SEDY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUT.L drawdown since its inception was -64.93%, which is greater than SEDY.L's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUT.L and SEDY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUT.LSEDY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.93%

-43.56%

-21.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.45%

-4.86%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-11.92%

-13.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

-29.66%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.37%

-30.39%

-6.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

-3.28%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.61%

-12.16%

-2.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

1.86%

+1.21%

Volatility

BUT.L vs. SEDY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brunner Investment Trust (BUT.L) is 3.34%, while iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that BUT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEDY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUT.LSEDY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

4.19%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

9.07%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.71%

11.43%

+2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.89%

14.75%

+4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.78%

16.22%

+3.56%

Dividends

BUT.L vs. SEDY.L - Dividend Comparison

BUT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than SEDY.L's 5.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUT.L
Brunner Investment Trust
1.69%1.73%1.62%1.89%2.11%1.82%2.32%2.19%2.61%2.12%2.57%2.87%
SEDY.L
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF
5.28%5.72%7.74%7.98%9.33%6.41%5.11%5.84%5.54%4.08%4.25%6.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUT.L and SEDY.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUT.L and SEDY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer