BUSIX vs. FAUDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BUSIX (Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund) and FAUDX (Strategic Advisers Short Duration Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUSIX charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for FAUDX.

Performance

BUSIX vs. FAUDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUSIX) and Strategic Advisers Short Duration Fund (FAUDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BUSIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FAUDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 0.28%
• 6M: 0.29%
• 1Y: 2.55%
• 3Y*: 4.10%
• 5Y*: 2.52%
• 10Y*: 21.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUSIX vs. FAUDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BUSIX Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund	0.83%	4.93%	5.87%	5.09%	0.32%	0.31%	2.16%	3.27%	1.66%	1.37%
FAUDX Strategic Advisers Short Duration Fund	0.28%	3.89%	4.75%	5.45%	-1.41%	-0.06%	2.40%	468.65%	1.30%	1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between BUSIX and FAUDX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between BUSIX and FAUDX has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BUSIX vs. FAUDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAUDX

FAUDX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FAUDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FAUDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FAUDX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FAUDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FAUDX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUSIX vs. FAUDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUSIX) and Strategic Advisers Short Duration Fund (FAUDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUSIX	FAUDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.42	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BUSIX	FAUDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-3.86%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.00%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.00%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-3.10%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-3.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.10%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.24%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.25%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BUSIX	FAUDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.56%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.06%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.50%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	1.60%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	42.32%	—

BUSIX vs. FAUDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUSIX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FAUDX's 0.26% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BUSIX vs. FAUDX - Dividend Comparison

BUSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than FAUDX's 3.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUSIX Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund	3.19%	4.29%	4.65%	3.48%	1.87%	1.24%	1.72%	2.60%	2.05%	1.57%	1.74%	1.36%
FAUDX Strategic Advisers Short Duration Fund	3.24%	3.62%	4.03%	3.85%	1.50%	0.63%	1.48%	131.91%	2.30%	1.44%	1.40%	0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUSIX and FAUDX in my portfolio?

BUSIX and FAUDX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.