BUSIX vs. BUBIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUSIX) and Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class (BUBIX).
BUSIX is managed by Sterling Capital. It was launched on Nov 30, 2012. BUBIX is an actively managed fund by Baird. It was launched on Dec 31, 2013.
Performance
BUSIX vs. BUBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BUSIX vs. BUBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUSIX Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund | 0.83% | 4.93% | 5.87% | 5.09% | 0.32% | 0.31% | 2.16% | 3.27% | 1.66% | 1.37% |
BUBIX Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class | 0.41% | 4.44% | 5.65% | 5.71% | 0.96% | 0.20% | 1.66% | 3.11% | 1.95% | 1.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUSIX achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly higher than BUBIX's 0.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BUSIX having a 2.68% annualized return and BUBIX not far behind at 2.64%.
BUSIX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
BUBIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- 2.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BUSIX vs. BUBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUSIX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than BUBIX's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BUSIX vs. BUBIX — Risk / Return Rank
BUSIX
BUBIX
BUSIX vs. BUBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUSIX) and Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class (BUBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUSIX | BUBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.78 | 5.61 | -1.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 13.61 | 11.20 | +2.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.42 | 6.33 | -0.91 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.23 | 13.47 | +2.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 104.01 | 127.89 | -23.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUSIX | BUBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.78 | 5.61 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.81 | 4.35 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.42 | 3.73 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.10 | 3.38 | -1.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between BUSIX and BUBIX is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BUSIX vs. BUBIX - Dividend Comparison
BUSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than BUBIX's 4.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUSIX Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund | 3.89% | 4.29% | 4.65% | 3.48% | 1.87% | 1.24% | 1.72% | 2.60% | 2.05% | 1.57% | 1.74% | 1.36% |
BUBIX Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class | 4.02% | 4.16% | 5.31% | 4.65% | 1.56% | 0.50% | 1.44% | 2.57% | 2.13% | 1.29% | 1.04% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
BUSIX vs. BUBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUSIX drawdown since its inception was -3.16%, which is greater than BUBIX's maximum drawdown of -1.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUSIX and BUBIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUSIX | BUBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.16% | -1.88% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.30% | -0.30% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.46% | -0.68% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.16% | -1.88% | -1.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.30% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.11% | -0.05% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 0.03% | +0.02% |
Volatility
BUSIX vs. BUBIX - Volatility Comparison
Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUSIX) and Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class (BUBIX) have volatilities of 0.36% and 0.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BUSIX | BUBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.36% | 0.35% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.89% | 0.54% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32% | 0.72% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.23% | 0.80% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.11% | 0.71% | +0.40% |