PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFX vs. PMAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFX vs. PMAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFX achieves a 4.10% return, which is significantly higher than PMAP's 3.28% return.


BUFX

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.35%
YTD
4.10%
6M
4.88%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PMAP

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.59%
YTD
3.28%
6M
3.83%
1Y
7.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFX vs. PMAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BUFX and PMAP is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.84

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFX vs. PMAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFX

PMAP
PMAP Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
PMAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PMAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFX vs. PMAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BUFX vs. PMAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFXPMAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.68

3.23

-0.55

Drawdowns

BUFX vs. PMAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFX drawdown since its inception was -2.87%, which is greater than PMAP's maximum drawdown of -1.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFX and PMAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFXPMAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-1.75%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.06%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

-0.08%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

Volatility

BUFX vs. PMAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFXPMAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

1.15%

+2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.98%

2.33%

+1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.98%

2.33%

+1.65%

BUFX vs. PMAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than PMAP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFX vs. PMAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFX nor PMAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFX and PMAP have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PMAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PMAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

BUFX and PMAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for BUFX and 0.50% for PMAP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFX and PMAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer