PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFSX vs. NEAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFSX vs. NEAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Buffalo Small Cap Fund (BUFSX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFSX achieves a 12.85% return, which is significantly lower than NEAIX's 59.81% return.


BUFSX

1D
1.15%
1M
5.14%
YTD
12.85%
6M
11.50%
1Y
19.44%
3Y*
6.33%
5Y*
-3.30%
10Y*
10.83%

NEAIX

1D
3.25%
1M
17.12%
YTD
59.81%
6M
61.32%
1Y
97.17%
3Y*
39.29%
5Y*
24.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFSX vs. NEAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUFSX
Buffalo Small Cap Fund
12.85%-0.13%5.38%5.45%-30.01%4.44%66.49%40.97%-5.73%25.95%
NEAIX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class
59.81%26.99%14.86%38.37%-27.02%38.46%52.49%44.68%-15.64%10.07%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFSX and NEAIX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.83

The correlation between BUFSX and NEAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFSX vs. NEAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFSX
BUFSX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BUFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

NEAIX
NEAIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NEAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFSX vs. NEAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Small Cap Fund (BUFSX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFSXNEAIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

3.94

-2.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.73

4.42

-2.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.59

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

7.27

-5.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.37

29.35

-23.98

BUFSX vs. NEAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the NEAIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFSX and NEAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFSXNEAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

3.94

-2.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.99

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.91

-0.45

Drawdowns

BUFSX vs. NEAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFSX drawdown since its inception was -53.24%, which is greater than NEAIX's maximum drawdown of -35.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFSX and NEAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFSXNEAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.24%

-35.93%

-17.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.92%

-13.98%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-28.21%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.57%

-35.93%

-10.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.13%

0.00%

-23.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.91%

-8.60%

-4.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

3.46%

+0.59%

Volatility

BUFSX vs. NEAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Buffalo Small Cap Fund (BUFSX) is 5.20%, while Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX) has a volatility of 10.14%. This indicates that BUFSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFSXNEAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

10.14%

-4.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.68%

20.44%

-6.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.96%

25.80%

-6.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.50%

24.58%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.57%

24.60%

-0.03%

BUFSX vs. NEAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFSX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAIX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFSX vs. NEAIX - Dividend Comparison

BUFSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFSX
Buffalo Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.53%9.01%9.14%31.02%30.30%25.19%70.18%
NEAIX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class
1.26%2.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.84%3.80%10.42%16.35%5.14%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFSX and NEAIX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEAIX has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to BUFSX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFSX dropped -53.24% vs NEAIX's -35.93%.

NEAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFSX and NEAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer