BUFS vs. UXJL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BUFS (FT Vest Laddered Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds from First Trust. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUFS charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.

Performance

BUFS vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFS) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFS achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.

BUFS

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 1.49%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 6M: 7.95%
• 1Y: 18.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UXJL

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 6.02%
• YTD: 11.78%
• 6M: 11.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFS vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BUFS FT Vest Laddered Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF	7.57%	6.98%
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July	11.78%	9.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFS and UXJL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025	0.77

Return for Risk

BUFS vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFS

BUFS Risk / Return Rank: 72
BUFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BUFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
BUFS Omega Ratio Rank: 65
BUFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BUFS Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFS vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFS) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUFS	UXJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.07	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.32	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUFS	UXJL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	1.87	-0.89

Drawdowns

BUFS vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFS drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, which is greater than UXJL's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFS and UXJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFS	UXJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.03%	-10.29%	-4.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-0.76%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.42%	-1.51%	-0.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BUFS	UXJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.83%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.45%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.99%	13.90%	-4.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.21%	13.90%	-2.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.21%	13.90%	-2.69%

BUFS vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFS has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFS vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFS nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFS and UXJL in my portfolio?

BUFS and UXJL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BUFS or UXJL?

On fees, UXJL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUFS or UXJL?

UXJL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for BUFS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUFS or UXJL?

BUFS and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BUFS and UXJL?

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for BUFS and 0.85% for UXJL.