BUFR vs. NFTY
BUFR (FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUFR is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while NFTY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. BUFR is actively managed, while NFTY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUFR returned 9.59%/yr vs 5.83%/yr for NFTY. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUFR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.
Performance
BUFR vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFR achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -6.80% return.
BUFR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 5.66%
- 6M
- 5.23%
- 1Y
- 15.03%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- —
NFTY
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- -6.80%
- 6M
- -6.38%
- 1Y
- -7.03%
- 3Y*
- 6.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.83%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
BUFR vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFR FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF | 5.66% | 12.44% | 14.68% | 19.63% | -7.57% | 11.88% | 6.60% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | -6.80% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 24.00% | -3.46% | 26.83% | 24.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFR and NFTY is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2020 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUFR vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank
BUFR
NFTY
BUFR vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUFR | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 0.93 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | -0.44 | +3.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.34 | -1.07 | +18.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUFR vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFR drawdown since its inception was -13.73%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFR and NFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFR | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.73% | -47.67% | +33.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -16.14% | +11.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.81% | -21.55% | +8.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.73% | -21.55% | +7.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -14.80% | +13.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.08% | -9.61% | +7.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 6.60% | -5.73% |
Volatility
BUFR vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) is 2.11%, while First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that BUFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUFR | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.11% | 4.34% | -2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.23% | 12.64% | -7.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.58% | 14.75% | -8.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.48% | 17.41% | -6.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.21% | 20.71% | -10.50% |
BUFR vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUFR vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison
BUFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFR FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.90% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUFR and NFTY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFTY has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to BUFR (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFR dropped -13.73% vs NFTY's -47.67%.
On 5-year performance, BUFR leads with 9.59% vs 5.83% for NFTY. On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, BUFR has been the lower-risk option at 2.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BUFR has performed better with a 9.59% return vs 5.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFR.
NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.00% for BUFR.
BUFR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFR and 0.80% for NFTY.
BUFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUFR and NFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer