PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFR vs. FTXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFR vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFR achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.


BUFR

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.16%
YTD
6.42%
6M
7.11%
1Y
17.61%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*

FTXL

1D
2.21%
1M
30.59%
YTD
115.70%
6M
113.17%
1Y
225.15%
3Y*
61.52%
5Y*
34.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFR vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BUFR
FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF
6.42%12.44%14.68%19.63%-7.57%11.88%7.57%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
115.70%48.94%7.59%54.41%-33.88%36.04%28.95%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFR and FTXL is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2020

0.73

The correlation between BUFR and FTXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

BUFR vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUFR
FTXL

Technology

35.8%
99.5%

Financial Services

11.8%

-

Communication Services

11.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

7.9%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

BUFR
35.8%
FTXL
99.5%

Financial Services

BUFR
11.8%
FTXL

-

Communication Services

BUFR
11.3%
FTXL

-

Consumer Cyclical

BUFR
10.2%
FTXL

-

Healthcare

BUFR
8.4%
FTXL

-

Industrials

BUFR
7.9%
FTXL
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

BUFR
4.9%
FTXL

-

Energy

BUFR
3.5%
FTXL

-

Utilities

BUFR
2.4%
FTXL

-

Real Estate

BUFR
1.9%
FTXL

-

Basic Materials

BUFR
1.8%
FTXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFR vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFR
BUFR Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BUFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFR Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FTXL
FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFR vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFRFTXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.78

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

15.62

-11.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.78

58.28

-37.51

BUFR vs. FTXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFR Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is lower than the FTXL Sharpe Ratio of 6.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFR and FTXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFRFTXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

6.33

-3.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.97

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.94

+0.14

Drawdowns

BUFR vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFR drawdown since its inception was -13.73%, smaller than the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFR and FTXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFRFTXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.73%

-43.87%

+30.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-14.51%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.81%

-41.57%

+28.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.73%

-43.87%

+30.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

0.00%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.09%

-10.56%

+8.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

3.88%

-3.03%

Volatility

BUFR vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) is 1.03%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that BUFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFRFTXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

14.28%

-13.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.95%

28.98%

-24.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.53%

35.94%

-29.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.44%

36.02%

-25.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.23%

34.25%

-24.02%

BUFR vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFR vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison

BUFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFR
FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
0.12%0.28%0.54%0.60%0.89%0.25%0.48%0.92%0.71%0.47%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFR and FTXL have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to BUFR (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFR dropped -13.73% vs FTXL's -43.87%.

On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs 9.98% for BUFR. On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BUFR has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 9.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFR.

FTXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for BUFR.

BUFR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FTXL is Semiconductors. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFR and 0.60% for FTXL.

FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFR and FTXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer