BUFP vs. YCS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BUFP (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - BUFP is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BUFP returned 17.31% vs 31.36% for YCS. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUFP charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

BUFP vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFP achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 9.78% return.

BUFP

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 6.33%
• 6M: 6.42%
• 1Y: 17.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

YCS

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 3.71%
• YTD: 9.78%
• 6M: 9.63%
• 1Y: 31.36%
• 3Y*: 18.43%
• 5Y*: 23.50%
• 10Y*: 13.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFP vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF	6.33%	12.92%	6.30%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	9.78%	9.04%	3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFP and YCS is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2024	0.00

The correlation between BUFP and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BUFP vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFP

BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 88
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 91
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 92

YCS

YCS Risk / Return Rank: 61
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 57
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFP vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUFP	YCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	1.86	+0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.02	2.37	+1.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.35	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.94	3.79	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.61	11.86	+9.75

BUFP vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFP Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFP and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BUFP vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFP drawdown since its inception was -11.98%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFP and YCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFP	YCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.98%	-49.56%	+37.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.41%	-8.30%	+3.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	0.00%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.99%	-19.88%	+18.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.80%	2.65%	-1.85%

Volatility

BUFP vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) is 1.99%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.22%. This indicates that BUFP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUFP	YCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.99%	2.22%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.11%	12.19%	-7.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.40%	16.96%	-10.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.46%	21.10%	-11.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.46%	18.96%	-9.50%

BUFP vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFP vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

BUFP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.02%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFP and YCS in my portfolio?

BUFP and YCS have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUFP or YCS?

YCS has higher volatility (2.22%) compared to BUFP (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFP dropped -11.98% vs YCS's -49.56%.

Which ETF is better, BUFP or YCS?

On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 31.36% vs 17.31% for BUFP. On fees, BUFP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BUFP has been the lower-risk option at 1.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUFP or YCS?

Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 31.36% return vs 17.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUFP or YCS?

BUFP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUFP or YCS?

BUFP has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

What is the main difference between BUFP and YCS?

BUFP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. BUFP tracks S&P 500, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: PGIM and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUFP and 1.00% for YCS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUFP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.