PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFGX vs. TILIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFGX vs. TILIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Buffalo Growth Fund (BUFGX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFGX achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly lower than TILIX's 8.99% return. Over the past 10 years, BUFGX has underperformed TILIX with an annualized return of 13.62%, while TILIX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.68% annualized return.


BUFGX

1D
0.78%
1M
4.41%
YTD
3.05%
6M
2.66%
1Y
18.88%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
13.62%

TILIX

1D
0.73%
1M
7.25%
YTD
8.99%
6M
8.17%
1Y
28.63%
3Y*
25.65%
5Y*
15.89%
10Y*
18.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFGX vs. TILIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUFGX
Buffalo Growth Fund
3.05%13.95%25.13%42.67%-31.19%21.52%28.29%31.89%0.69%22.76%
TILIX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
8.99%18.41%33.31%42.64%-29.22%27.63%38.43%36.30%-1.66%28.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFGX and TILIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002

0.96

The correlation between BUFGX and TILIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFGX vs. TILIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFGX
BUFGX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BUFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

TILIX
TILIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TILIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TILIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFGX vs. TILIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Growth Fund (BUFGX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFGXTILIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

1.92

-0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

2.59

-0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.33

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

1.83

-0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.64

6.15

-2.51

BUFGX vs. TILIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the TILIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFGX and TILIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFGXTILIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.92

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.74

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.89

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.61

-0.07

Drawdowns

BUFGX vs. TILIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFGX drawdown since its inception was -50.17%, roughly equal to the maximum TILIX drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFGX and TILIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFGXTILIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.17%

-50.54%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.63%

-16.24%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.93%

-23.33%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.68%

-32.68%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.68%

-32.68%

-3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.97%

-7.74%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

4.84%

+0.43%

Volatility

BUFGX vs. TILIX - Volatility Comparison

Buffalo Growth Fund (BUFGX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX) have volatilities of 3.11% and 3.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFGXTILIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

3.25%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.63%

11.62%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.08%

15.45%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.37%

21.47%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.71%

21.09%

-0.38%

BUFGX vs. TILIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFGX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than TILIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFGX vs. TILIX - Dividend Comparison

BUFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, more than TILIX's 4.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFGX
Buffalo Growth Fund
5.94%6.12%8.55%5.55%4.77%9.90%4.97%13.60%34.64%20.49%0.00%18.46%
TILIX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
4.05%4.41%3.25%1.90%11.00%8.76%1.91%2.38%4.01%0.68%1.33%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BUFGX and TILIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TILIX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to BUFGX (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFGX dropped -50.17% vs TILIX's -50.54%.

TILIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFGX and TILIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer