BUFG vs. IVVB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BUFG (FT Cboe Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF) and IVVB (iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BUFG returned 17.53% vs 14.57% for IVVB. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BUFG charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IVVB.

Performance

BUFG vs. IVVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF (BUFG) and iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFG achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly higher than IVVB's 4.57% return.

BUFG

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 2.34%
• YTD: 6.40%
• 6M: 6.86%
• 1Y: 17.53%
• 3Y*: 14.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IVVB

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 1.91%
• YTD: 4.57%
• 6M: 4.37%
• 1Y: 14.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFG vs. IVVB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BUFG FT Cboe Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF	6.40%	12.33%	15.13%	5.45%
IVVB iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF	4.57%	9.60%	18.66%	2.60%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFG and IVVB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2023	0.89

The correlation between BUFG and IVVB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

BUFG vs. IVVB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BUFG	IVVB
Technology	36.2%	35.6%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.8%
Communication Services	10.9%	11.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.5%
Industrials	8.1%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

BUFG vs. IVVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFG

BUFG Risk / Return Rank: 73
BUFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
BUFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BUFG Omega Ratio Rank: 76
BUFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
BUFG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

IVVB

IVVB Risk / Return Rank: 58
IVVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
IVVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
IVVB Omega Ratio Rank: 63
IVVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
IVVB Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFG vs. IVVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF (BUFG) and iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUFG	IVVB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	2.02	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	2.82	+0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.39	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	2.55	+0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.15	10.94	+5.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BUFG vs. IVVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFG Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the IVVB Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFG and IVVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUFG	IVVB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	2.02	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	1.31	-0.57

Drawdowns

BUFG vs. IVVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFG drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, which is greater than IVVB's maximum drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFG and IVVB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFG	IVVB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.62%	-13.08%	-4.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.74%	-5.75%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-0.15%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.62%	-1.61%	-2.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.09%	1.34%	-0.25%

Volatility

BUFG vs. IVVB - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF (BUFG) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) at 0.74%. This indicates that BUFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUFG	IVVB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.20%	0.74%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.82%	5.49%	+0.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.64%	7.27%	+0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.84%	9.28%	+2.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.84%	9.28%	+2.56%

BUFG vs. IVVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFG has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVB's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFG vs. IVVB - Dividend Comparison

BUFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BUFG FT Cboe Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IVVB iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF	1.17%	1.22%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFG and IVVB in my portfolio?

BUFG and IVVB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUFG or IVVB?

BUFG has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to IVVB (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFG dropped -17.62% vs IVVB's -13.08%.

Which ETF is better, BUFG or IVVB?

On 1-year performance, BUFG leads with 17.53% vs 14.57% for IVVB. On fees, IVVB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IVVB has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUFG or IVVB?

Over the 1-year period, BUFG has performed better with a 17.53% return vs 14.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUFG or IVVB?

IVVB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for BUFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUFG or IVVB?

IVVB has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.00% for BUFG.

What is the main difference between BUFG and IVVB?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for BUFG and 0.50% for IVVB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.