BUFF vs. TJUL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) and TJUL (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025) are both exchange-traded funds - BUFF is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index, while TJUL is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. BUFF is passively managed, while TJUL is actively managed. Over the past year, BUFF returned 14.36% vs 5.85% for TJUL. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUFF charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for TJUL.

Performance

BUFF vs. TJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFF achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly higher than TJUL's 2.08% return.

BUFF

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 1.68%
• YTD: 5.42%
• 6M: 5.90%
• 1Y: 14.36%
• 3Y*: 12.47%
• 5Y*: 8.71%
• 10Y*: —

TJUL

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: 2.08%
• 6M: 2.41%
• 1Y: 5.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFF vs. TJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF	5.42%	11.02%	12.05%	4.46%
TJUL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025	2.08%	6.55%	8.18%	3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFF and TJUL is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2023	0.75

The correlation between BUFF and TJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

BUFF vs. TJUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BUFF	TJUL
Technology	36.2%	33.6%
Financial Services	11.9%	12.4%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.0%
Healthcare	8.4%	9.5%
Industrials	8.1%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	5.3%
Energy	3.5%	4.0%
Utilities	2.3%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.9%

Return for Risk

BUFF vs. TJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFF

BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 86
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 90

TJUL

TJUL Risk / Return Rank: 65
TJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
TJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
TJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 67
TJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
TJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFF vs. TJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUFF	TJUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	2.12	+0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.24	3.12	+1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.41	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.02	2.82	+1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.50	13.10	+8.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BUFF vs. TJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFF Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the TJUL Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFF and TJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUFF	TJUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.80	2.12	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	1.64	-1.14

Drawdowns

BUFF vs. TJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFF drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, which is greater than TJUL's maximum drawdown of -4.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFF and TJUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFF	TJUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.23%	-4.61%	-41.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.58%	-2.08%	-1.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-0.12%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-0.39%	-5.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	0.45%	+0.22%

Volatility

BUFF vs. TJUL - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) has a higher volatility of 1.02% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) at 0.51%. This indicates that BUFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUFF	TJUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	0.51%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.83%	2.14%	+1.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.15%	2.77%	+2.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.41%	4.26%	+4.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.67%	4.26%	+13.41%

BUFF vs. TJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than TJUL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFF vs. TJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFF nor TJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.78%	1.26%	1.74%	1.55%	0.18%
TJUL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFF and TJUL in my portfolio?

BUFF and TJUL have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUFF or TJUL?

BUFF has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to TJUL (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFF dropped -46.23% vs TJUL's -4.61%.

Which ETF is better, BUFF or TJUL?

On 1-year performance, BUFF leads with 14.36% vs 5.85% for TJUL. On fees, TJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, TJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUFF or TJUL?

Over the 1-year period, BUFF has performed better with a 14.36% return vs 5.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUFF or TJUL?

TJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUFF or TJUL?

BUFF and TJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BUFF and TJUL?

BUFF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while TJUL is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for BUFF and 0.79% for TJUL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.