BUFF vs. POCT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) and POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - BUFF tracks the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index while POCT tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUFF returned 8.52%/yr vs 9.65%/yr for POCT. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUFF charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for POCT.

Performance

BUFF vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BUFF having a 4.91% return and POCT slightly lower at 4.83%.

BUFF

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: 4.91%
• 6M: 4.62%
• 1Y: 13.10%
• 3Y*: 11.92%
• 5Y*: 8.52%
• 10Y*: —

POCT

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 4.83%
• 6M: 4.49%
• 1Y: 13.26%
• 3Y*: 11.57%
• 5Y*: 9.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFF vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF	4.91%	11.02%	12.05%	16.51%	-4.44%	8.37%	-12.08%	32.32%	-5.49%
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	4.83%	11.00%	9.54%	20.12%	-1.26%	9.46%	10.40%	12.80%	-7.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFF and POCT is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018	0.80

The correlation between BUFF and POCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BUFF vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFF

BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 85
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 87
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 89

POCT

POCT Risk / Return Rank: 74
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFF vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUFF	POCT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	2.16	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.76	3.08	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.43	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.67	3.03	+0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.13	15.34	+3.79

BUFF vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFF Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the POCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFF and POCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BUFF vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFF drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, which is greater than POCT's maximum drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFF and POCT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFF	POCT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.23%	-18.80%	-27.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.58%	-4.40%	+0.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.24%	-10.22%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.24%	-10.22%	-0.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-0.90%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.15%	-1.49%	-4.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.69%	0.87%	-0.18%

Volatility

BUFF vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) have volatilities of 1.73% and 1.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUFF	POCT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.73%	1.80%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.11%	4.96%	-0.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.27%	6.19%	-0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.44%	7.97%	+0.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.63%	10.21%	+7.42%

BUFF vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than POCT's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFF vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFF nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.78%	1.26%	1.74%	1.55%	0.18%
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFF and POCT in my portfolio?

BUFF and POCT have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUFF or POCT?

POCT has higher volatility (1.80%) compared to BUFF (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFF dropped -46.23% vs POCT's -18.80%.

Which ETF is better, BUFF or POCT?

On 5-year performance, POCT leads with 9.65% vs 8.52% for BUFF. On fees, POCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUFF or POCT?

Over the 5-year period, POCT has performed better with a 9.65% return vs 8.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUFF or POCT?

POCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUFF or POCT?

BUFF and POCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BUFF and POCT?

BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index, while POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for BUFF and 0.79% for POCT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.