PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFF vs. PJAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFF vs. PJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFF achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly higher than PJAN's 5.13% return.


BUFF

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.68%
YTD
5.42%
6M
5.90%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*

PJAN

1D
-0.26%
1M
1.94%
YTD
5.13%
6M
5.96%
1Y
14.71%
3Y*
12.96%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFF vs. PJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
5.42%11.02%12.05%16.51%-4.44%8.37%-12.08%33.93%
PJAN
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January
5.13%11.29%13.45%18.18%-5.29%8.80%7.68%12.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFF and PJAN is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019

0.81

The correlation between BUFF and PJAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFF vs. PJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

PJAN
PJAN Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFF vs. PJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFFPJANDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.54

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

3.19

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.50

17.03

+4.46

BUFF vs. PJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFF Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the PJAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFF and PJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFFPJANDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

2.55

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

1.00

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.90

-0.40

Drawdowns

BUFF vs. PJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFF drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, which is greater than PJAN's maximum drawdown of -21.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFF and PJAN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFFPJANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.23%

-21.25%

-24.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.58%

-4.63%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.24%

-10.49%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.24%

-11.93%

+1.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.26%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-1.73%

-4.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

0.87%

-0.20%

Volatility

BUFF vs. PJAN - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN) have volatilities of 1.02% and 1.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFFPJANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

1.07%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.83%

4.71%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.15%

5.81%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.41%

8.93%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

10.60%

+7.07%

BUFF vs. PJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PJAN's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFF vs. PJAN - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFF nor PJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%
PJAN
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFF and PJAN have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PJAN has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFF dropped -46.23% vs PJAN's -21.25%.

On 5-year performance, PJAN leads with 8.92% vs 8.71% for BUFF. On fees, PJAN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PJAN has performed better with a 8.92% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PJAN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

BUFF and PJAN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index, while PJAN tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect January Series Index. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for BUFF and 0.79% for PJAN.

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFF and PJAN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer