BUFF vs. PAPR
BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) and PAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - BUFF tracks the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index while PAPR tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect April Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUFF returned 8.53%/yr vs 8.23%/yr for PAPR. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BUFF charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for PAPR.
Performance
BUFF vs. PAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFF achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly lower than PAPR's 7.18% return.
BUFF
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 6M
- 5.14%
- 1Y
- 13.15%
- 3Y*
- 12.08%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- —
PAPR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 7.18%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- 1Y
- 14.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.34%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFF vs. PAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 4.55% | 11.02% | 12.05% | 16.51% | -4.44% | 8.37% | -12.08% | 16.44% |
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 7.18% | 6.58% | 12.28% | 16.45% | -4.29% | 7.51% | 4.62% | 6.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFF and PAPR is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2019 | 0.80 |
The correlation between BUFF and PAPR shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BUFF vs. PAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUFF
PAPR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BUFF
PAPR
Financial Services
BUFF
PAPR
Communication Services
BUFF
PAPR
Consumer Cyclical
BUFF
PAPR
Healthcare
BUFF
PAPR
Industrials
BUFF
PAPR
Consumer Defensive
BUFF
PAPR
Energy
BUFF
PAPR
Utilities
BUFF
PAPR
Real Estate
BUFF
PAPR
Basic Materials
BUFF
PAPR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUFF vs. PAPR — Risk / Return Rank
BUFF
PAPR
BUFF vs. PAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUFF | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 2.03 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 17.02 | -13.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.47 | 73.26 | -53.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUFF | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 4.24 | -1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 1.01 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.83 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
BUFF vs. PAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFF drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, which is greater than PAPR's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFF and PAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFF | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.23% | -15.31% | -30.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.58% | -0.83% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.24% | -11.87% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.24% | -11.87% | +1.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -0.71% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.17% | -1.57% | -4.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 0.19% | +0.49% |
Volatility
BUFF vs. PAPR - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) at 1.05%. This indicates that BUFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUFF | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 1.05% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.93% | 2.55% | +1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.19% | 3.34% | +1.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.42% | 8.21% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 9.44% | +8.22% |
BUFF vs. PAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUFF vs. PAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither BUFF nor PAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.55% | 0.18% |
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUFF and PAPR have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUFF has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to PAPR (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFF dropped -46.23% vs PAPR's -15.31%.
On 5-year performance, BUFF leads with 8.53% vs 8.23% for PAPR. On fees, PAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, PAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BUFF has performed better with a 8.53% return vs 8.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.
BUFF and PAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index, while PAPR tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect April Series Index. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for BUFF and 0.79% for PAPR.
PAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.24 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUFF and PAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer