PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFF vs. BJAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFF vs. BJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFF achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly lower than BJAN's 5.69% return.


BUFF

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.01%
YTD
4.55%
6M
5.14%
1Y
13.15%
3Y*
12.08%
5Y*
8.53%
10Y*

BJAN

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.24%
YTD
5.69%
6M
7.09%
1Y
18.63%
3Y*
16.61%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFF vs. BJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
4.55%11.02%12.05%16.51%-4.44%8.37%-12.08%32.32%
BJAN
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January
5.69%14.81%17.36%23.66%-11.40%13.86%12.54%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFF and BJAN is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2019

0.84

The correlation between BUFF and BJAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

BUFF vs. BJAN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUFF
BJAN

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

BUFF
36.2%
BJAN
36.2%

Financial Services

BUFF
11.9%
BJAN
11.9%

Communication Services

BUFF
10.9%
BJAN
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BUFF
10.1%
BJAN
10.1%

Healthcare

BUFF
8.4%
BJAN
8.4%

Industrials

BUFF
8.1%
BJAN
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

BUFF
4.9%
BJAN
4.9%

Energy

BUFF
3.5%
BJAN
3.5%

Utilities

BUFF
2.3%
BJAN
2.3%

Real Estate

BUFF
1.9%
BJAN
1.9%

Basic Materials

BUFF
1.8%
BJAN
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFF vs. BJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

BJAN
BJAN Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFF vs. BJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFFBJANDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.47

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

2.99

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.47

15.01

+4.46

BUFF vs. BJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFF Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the BJAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFF and BJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFFBJANDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.41

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.87

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.91

-0.42

Drawdowns

BUFF vs. BJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFF drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, which is greater than BJAN's maximum drawdown of -26.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFF and BJAN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFFBJANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.23%

-26.86%

-19.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.58%

-6.27%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.24%

-13.81%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.24%

-17.38%

+7.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-1.47%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-2.90%

-3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

1.24%

-0.56%

Volatility

BUFF vs. BJAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) is 1.22%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) has a volatility of 1.84%. This indicates that BUFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFFBJANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

1.84%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.93%

6.23%

-2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.19%

7.78%

-2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.42%

11.99%

-3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.66%

14.06%

+3.60%

BUFF vs. BJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than BJAN's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFF vs. BJAN - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFF nor BJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BJAN
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFF and BJAN have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BJAN has higher volatility (1.84%) compared to BUFF (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFF dropped -46.23% vs BJAN's -26.86%.

On 5-year performance, BJAN leads with 10.36% vs 8.53% for BUFF. On fees, BJAN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BUFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BJAN has performed better with a 10.36% return vs 8.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BJAN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

BUFF and BJAN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index, while BJAN tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for BUFF and 0.79% for BJAN.

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFF and BJAN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer