PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFDX vs. FLCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFDX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Buffalo Dividend Focus Fund (BUFDX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFDX achieves a 7.73% return, which is significantly lower than FLCPX's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, BUFDX has underperformed FLCPX with an annualized return of 12.80%, while FLCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.67% annualized return.


BUFDX

1D
0.73%
1M
1.67%
YTD
7.73%
6M
7.87%
1Y
16.77%
3Y*
16.33%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
12.80%

FLCPX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.81%
YTD
11.72%
6M
11.75%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
14.29%
10Y*
15.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFDX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUFDX
Buffalo Dividend Focus Fund
7.73%8.39%20.13%20.07%-8.77%20.95%16.62%27.67%-5.06%17.64%
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
11.72%17.84%25.08%26.25%-18.06%28.61%18.24%31.59%-4.38%21.74%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFDX and FLCPX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2016

0.94

The correlation between BUFDX and FLCPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFDX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFDX
BUFDX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BUFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCPX
FLCPX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FLCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFDX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Dividend Focus Fund (BUFDX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFDXFLCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.46

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.38

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.90

15.75

-5.85

BUFDX vs. FLCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the FLCPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFDX and FLCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFDXFLCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.53

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.84

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.87

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.92

-0.05

Drawdowns

BUFDX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFDX drawdown since its inception was -33.11%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCPX drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFDX and FLCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFDXFLCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.11%

-33.87%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.66%

-8.89%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.71%

-18.76%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.71%

-24.40%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.11%

-33.87%

+0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-4.19%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

1.90%

-0.14%

Volatility

BUFDX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Buffalo Dividend Focus Fund (BUFDX) is 1.72%, while Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that BUFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFDXFLCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

2.82%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.63%

8.98%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.31%

11.86%

-1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

17.06%

-2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.89%

18.16%

-2.27%

BUFDX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFDX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFDX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison

BUFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than FLCPX's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFDX
Buffalo Dividend Focus Fund
1.47%1.23%1.26%1.95%2.61%1.72%0.46%1.09%5.20%1.76%0.96%3.23%
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
0.50%0.56%6.11%7.05%11.23%10.38%3.93%1.74%2.18%1.57%0.76%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFDX and FLCPX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCPX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to BUFDX (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFDX dropped -33.11% vs FLCPX's -33.87%.

FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFDX and FLCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer