BUFD vs. FFEB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BUFD (FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF) and FFEB (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February) are both Defined Outcome funds from FT Vest. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUFD returned 7.62%/yr vs 11.09%/yr for FFEB. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BUFD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FFEB.

Performance

BUFD vs. FFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFD achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than FFEB's 7.65% return.

BUFD

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: 5.08%
• 6M: 5.68%
• 1Y: 14.40%
• 3Y*: 12.09%
• 5Y*: 7.62%
• 10Y*: —

FFEB

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 7.65%
• 6M: 8.55%
• 1Y: 19.32%
• 3Y*: 16.35%
• 5Y*: 11.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFD vs. FFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BUFD FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF	5.08%	10.66%	12.42%	15.40%	-7.70%	5.97%
FFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February	7.65%	13.76%	16.64%	19.95%	-7.51%	15.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFD and FFEB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021	0.86

The correlation between BUFD and FFEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

BUFD vs. FFEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BUFD	FFEB
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

BUFD vs. FFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFD

BUFD Risk / Return Rank: 87
BUFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BUFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
BUFD Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BUFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BUFD Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FFEB

FFEB Risk / Return Rank: 82
FFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFD vs. FFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUFD	FFEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	2.73	+0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.32	3.94	+0.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.55	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.21	3.39	+0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	22.97	18.01	+4.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BUFD vs. FFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFD Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the FFEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFD and FFEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUFD	FFEB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79	2.73	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99	1.03	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	0.87	+0.13

Drawdowns

BUFD vs. FFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFD drawdown since its inception was -10.75%, smaller than the maximum FFEB drawdown of -22.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFD and FFEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFD	FFEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.75%	-22.81%	+12.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.43%	-5.73%	+2.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.15%	-11.89%	+1.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.75%	-13.85%	+3.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-0.30%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.97%	-2.40%	+0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.63%	1.08%	-0.45%

Volatility

BUFD vs. FFEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD) is 0.79%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that BUFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUFD	FFEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.79%	1.24%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.94%	5.56%	-1.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.19%	7.12%	-1.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.73%	10.81%	-3.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.55%	13.75%	-6.20%

BUFD vs. FFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FFEB's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFD vs. FFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFD nor FFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFD and FFEB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, BUFD and FFEB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BUFD or FFEB?

FFEB has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to BUFD (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFD dropped -10.75% vs FFEB's -22.81%.

Which ETF is better, BUFD or FFEB?

On 5-year performance, FFEB leads with 11.09% vs 7.62% for BUFD. On fees, FFEB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BUFD has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUFD or FFEB?

Over the 5-year period, FFEB has performed better with a 11.09% return vs 7.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUFD or FFEB?

FFEB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUFD or FFEB?

BUFD and FFEB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BUFD and FFEB?

Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFD and 0.85% for FFEB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.