BUFBX vs. FGINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX).
BUFBX is managed by Buffalo. It was launched on Aug 12, 1994. FGINX is managed by Delaware Funds. It was launched on Oct 4, 1993.
Performance
BUFBX vs. FGINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BUFBX vs. FGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFBX Buffalo Flexible Income Fund | 7.60% | 10.37% | 10.26% | 7.42% | 3.97% | 29.97% | -2.27% | 18.76% | -7.01% | 13.20% |
FGINX Delaware Growth and Income Fund | 4.63% | 29.78% | 15.13% | 11.98% | 3.03% | 21.37% | -0.08% | 25.64% | -10.27% | 18.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFBX achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly higher than FGINX's 4.63% return. Over the past 10 years, BUFBX has underperformed FGINX with an annualized return of 9.68%, while FGINX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.18% annualized return.
BUFBX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 13.19%
- 3Y*
- 12.40%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
FGINX
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 29.67%
- 3Y*
- 21.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BUFBX vs. FGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFBX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FGINX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BUFBX vs. FGINX — Risk / Return Rank
BUFBX
FGINX
BUFBX vs. FGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUFBX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 1.84 | -0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 2.47 | -1.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.38 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 2.55 | -1.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.80 | 10.90 | -5.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUFBX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 1.84 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 1.01 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.72 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.53 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFBX and FGINX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BUFBX vs. FGINX - Dividend Comparison
BUFBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.47%, less than FGINX's 10.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFBX Buffalo Flexible Income Fund | 8.47% | 9.10% | 3.77% | 3.48% | 4.16% | 5.57% | 3.33% | 2.73% | 6.01% | 5.49% | 2.39% | 3.67% |
FGINX Delaware Growth and Income Fund | 10.86% | 11.28% | 12.40% | 7.11% | 7.04% | 11.97% | 6.59% | 51.75% | 25.36% | 5.13% | 4.12% | 5.66% |
Drawdowns
BUFBX vs. FGINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFBX drawdown since its inception was -39.78%, smaller than the maximum FGINX drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFBX and FGINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFBX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.78% | -54.80% | +15.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.57% | -11.56% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.67% | -16.21% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.51% | -37.37% | +1.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -5.46% | +4.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.74% | -9.74% | +5.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 2.70% | -0.29% |
Volatility
BUFBX vs. FGINX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX) is 2.13%, while Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that BUFBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BUFBX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.13% | 4.24% | -2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.66% | 9.01% | -2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.87% | 16.22% | -2.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.40% | 14.88% | -1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 17.04% | -1.46% |