PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFB vs. JANB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFB vs. JANB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF (BUFB) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFB achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly higher than JANB's 5.24% return.


BUFB

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
5.97%
6M
5.58%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
10Y*

JANB

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
5.24%
6M
5.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFB vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BUFB and JANB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFB vs. JANB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFB
BUFB Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BUFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFB Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFB Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

JANB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFB vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF (BUFB) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUFBJANBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.22

BUFB vs. JANB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUFB vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFB drawdown since its inception was -14.88%, which is greater than JANB's maximum drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFB and JANB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFBJANBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.88%

-6.52%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-1.04%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.85%

-1.10%

-1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

Volatility

BUFB vs. JANB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFBJANBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.67%

7.49%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.98%

7.49%

+4.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.98%

7.49%

+4.49%

BUFB vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFB has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFB vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFB nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, BUFB and JANB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFB.

BUFB and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for BUFB and 0.25% for JANB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFB and JANB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer