PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFB vs. IAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BUFB vs. IAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF (BUFB) and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BUFB vs. IAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BUFB
Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF
-1.98%13.42%16.37%20.50%-8.37%
IAPR
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April
2.69%15.51%3.76%7.67%-6.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFB achieves a -1.98% return, which is significantly lower than IAPR's 2.69% return.


BUFB

1D
1.90%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
-1.98%
6M
0.48%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
10Y*

IAPR

1D
1.25%
1M
0.70%
YTD
2.69%
6M
5.32%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
8.92%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BUFB vs. IAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFB has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than IAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BUFB vs. IAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFB
BUFB Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BUFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFB Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFB Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IAPR
IAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFB vs. IAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF (BUFB) and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFBIAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

1.80

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

2.62

-0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.43

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

2.33

-0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.88

15.34

-6.46

BUFB vs. IAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFB Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the IAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFB and IAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFBIAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.80

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.54

+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between BUFB and IAPR is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BUFB vs. IAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFB nor IAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BUFB vs. IAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFB drawdown since its inception was -14.88%, smaller than the maximum IAPR drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFB and IAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFBIAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.88%

-17.73%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.23%

-6.08%

-3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

0.00%

-3.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-3.99%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

0.92%

+0.74%

Volatility

BUFB vs. IAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF (BUFB) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) at 2.78%. This indicates that BUFB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BUFBIAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

2.78%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.89%

3.92%

+1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

8.38%

+4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.17%

8.70%

+3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.17%

8.70%

+3.47%