BTYB vs. ARMW
BTYB (VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTYB charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
BTYB vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BTYB
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMW
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- 128.75%
- YTD
- 363.23%
- 6M
- 245.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTYB vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BTYB VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF | -2.35% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 392.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTYB and ARMW is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTYB vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF (BTYB) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTYB | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.81 | 4.96 | -5.76 |
Drawdowns
BTYB vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTYB drawdown since its inception was -3.99%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTYB and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTYB | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -48.47% | +44.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.99% | 0.00% | -3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -26.55% | +25.57% |
Volatility
BTYB vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTYB | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.71% | 88.46% | -79.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.71% | 88.46% | -79.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.71% | 88.46% | -79.75% |
BTYB vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTYB has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTYB vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
BTYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than ARMW's 15.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 15.20% | 16.38% |
BTYB VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF | 2.70% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTYB and ARMW have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTYB is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTYB is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 2.70% for BTYB.
They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for BTYB and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for BTYB and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer