BTR vs. SIXA
BTR (Beacon Tactical Risk ETF) and SIXA (6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BTR returned 5.01%/yr vs 20.55%/yr for SIXA. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTR charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for SIXA.
Performance
BTR vs. SIXA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTR achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly lower than SIXA's 14.28% return.
BTR
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- YTD
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 16.71%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIXA
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 12.74%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 1Y
- 19.26%
- 3Y*
- 20.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- —
BTR vs. SIXA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BTR Beacon Tactical Risk ETF | 9.98% | -2.15% | 14.45% | -6.78% |
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 14.28% | 15.52% | 22.70% | 9.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTR and SIXA is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023 | 0.72 |
The correlation between BTR and SIXA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
BTR vs. SIXA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BTR
SIXA
Technology
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Technology
BTR
SIXA
Energy
BTR
SIXA
Consumer Cyclical
BTR
SIXA
Communication Services
BTR
SIXA
Industrials
BTR
SIXA
Healthcare
BTR
SIXA
Utilities
BTR
SIXA
Basic Materials
BTR
SIXA
-
Real Estate
BTR
SIXA
Consumer Defensive
BTR
SIXA
Financial Services
BTR
SIXA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTR vs. SIXA — Risk / Return Rank
BTR
SIXA
BTR vs. SIXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTR | SIXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.36 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 3.25 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.07 | 12.31 | -2.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTR vs. SIXA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTR drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, smaller than the maximum SIXA drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTR and SIXA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTR | SIXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.67% | -18.38% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -5.59% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.67% | -11.22% | -5.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | 0.00% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -2.96% | -2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 1.48% | +0.14% |
Volatility
BTR vs. SIXA - Volatility Comparison
Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR) has a higher volatility of 2.62% compared to 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) at 2.46%. This indicates that BTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTR | SIXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 2.46% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.24% | 6.95% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.87% | 8.92% | +0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.86% | 12.78% | -1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.86% | 13.29% | -2.43% |
BTR vs. SIXA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SIXA's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTR vs. SIXA - Dividend Comparison
BTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than SIXA's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTR Beacon Tactical Risk ETF | 1.17% | 1.29% | 0.87% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 2.00% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 2.12% | 2.23% | 1.63% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTR and SIXA have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTR has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to SIXA (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTR dropped -16.67% vs SIXA's -18.38%.
On 3-year performance, SIXA leads with 20.55% vs 5.01% for BTR. On fees, SIXA is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, SIXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SIXA has performed better with a 20.55% return vs 5.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIXA is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for BTR.
SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.17% for BTR.
They also come from different issuers: American Beacon and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for BTR and 0.86% for SIXA.
SIXA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTR and SIXA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer