PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTOP vs. IBLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTOP vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Bitcoin And Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BTOP) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTOP achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's 32.34% return.


BTOP

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.13%
YTD
-0.19%
6M
-7.39%
1Y
-10.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBLC

1D
-3.00%
1M
13.52%
YTD
32.34%
6M
15.25%
1Y
73.27%
3Y*
48.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTOP vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BTOP
Bitwise Bitcoin And Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF
-0.19%-15.87%62.27%41.71%
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
32.34%27.05%18.58%81.59%

Correlation

The correlation between BTOP and IBLC is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023

0.56

The correlation between BTOP and IBLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTOP vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTOP
BTOP Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

IBLC
IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTOP vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin And Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BTOP) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTOPIBLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.23

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

1.64

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.63

3.26

-3.89

BTOP vs. IBLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTOP Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the IBLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTOP and IBLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTOPIBLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

1.34

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.40

+0.21

Drawdowns

BTOP vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTOP drawdown since its inception was -43.37%, smaller than the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTOP and IBLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTOPIBLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.37%

-62.54%

+19.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.35%

-44.94%

+13.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.59%

-12.99%

-16.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.28%

-25.89%

+6.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.91%

22.56%

-0.65%

Volatility

BTOP vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bitwise Bitcoin And Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BTOP) is 7.72%, while iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) has a volatility of 14.67%. This indicates that BTOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTOPIBLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.72%

14.67%

-6.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.63%

40.76%

-17.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.72%

54.94%

-22.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.22%

64.49%

-18.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.22%

64.49%

-18.27%

BTOP vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTOP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTOP vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison

BTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than IBLC's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BTOP
Bitwise Bitcoin And Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF
2.39%2.38%59.44%5.82%0.00%
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
4.77%6.31%1.60%1.79%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTOP and IBLC have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBLC has higher volatility (14.67%) compared to BTOP (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTOP dropped -43.37% vs IBLC's -62.54%.

On 1-year performance, IBLC leads with 73.27% vs -10.58% for BTOP. On fees, IBLC is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, BTOP has been the lower-risk option at 7.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBLC has performed better with a 73.27% return vs -10.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBLC is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BTOP.

IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 2.39% for BTOP.

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BTOP and 0.47% for IBLC.

IBLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTOP and IBLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer