PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTMSX vs. BMDSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTMSX vs. BMDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund (BTMSX) and Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund (BMDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTMSX achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than BMDSX's 6.27% return. Over the past 10 years, BTMSX has underperformed BMDSX with an annualized return of 1.83%, while BMDSX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.67% annualized return.


BTMSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.25%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
1.83%

BMDSX

1D
0.17%
1M
2.80%
YTD
6.27%
6M
4.43%
1Y
0.97%
3Y*
0.84%
5Y*
-0.61%
10Y*
8.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTMSX vs. BMDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTMSX
Baird Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund
0.97%4.46%2.98%3.90%-4.01%0.59%2.90%3.81%1.34%2.45%
BMDSX
Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund
6.27%-9.55%-1.16%19.91%-27.86%21.81%34.56%35.94%-1.52%26.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BTMSX and BMDSX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.06

The correlation between BTMSX and BMDSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTMSX vs. BMDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTMSX
BTMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BTMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BTMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BMDSX
BMDSX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BMDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BMDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTMSX vs. BMDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund (BTMSX) and Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund (BMDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTMSXBMDSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.69

0.15

+3.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.00

0.33

+5.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.26

1.04

+1.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

0.16

+3.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.35

0.35

+12.00

BTMSX vs. BMDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTMSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.69, which is higher than the BMDSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTMSX and BMDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTMSXBMDSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69

0.15

+3.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

-0.03

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

0.42

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.34

+0.69

Drawdowns

BTMSX vs. BMDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTMSX drawdown since its inception was -6.51%, smaller than the maximum BMDSX drawdown of -53.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTMSX and BMDSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTMSXBMDSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.51%

-53.96%

+47.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.10%

-14.54%

+13.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.89%

-25.04%

+23.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.51%

-36.24%

+29.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.51%

-36.24%

+29.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-20.93%

+20.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.94%

-10.95%

+10.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

6.75%

-6.42%

Volatility

BTMSX vs. BMDSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baird Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund (BTMSX) is 0.36%, while Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund (BMDSX) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that BTMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTMSXBMDSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

3.87%

-3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.84%

11.62%

-10.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10%

15.22%

-14.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.72%

21.03%

-19.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.84%

20.79%

-18.95%

BTMSX vs. BMDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTMSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BMDSX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTMSX vs. BMDSX - Dividend Comparison

BTMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than BMDSX's 13.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMDSX
Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund
13.06%13.88%4.57%2.44%1.79%17.82%10.09%5.77%6.62%4.87%0.00%0.15%
BTMSX
Baird Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund
3.07%3.05%2.93%2.48%1.36%0.88%1.30%1.66%1.53%1.43%1.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTMSX and BMDSX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMDSX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to BTMSX (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTMSX dropped -6.51% vs BMDSX's -53.96%.

BTMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTMSX and BMDSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer