PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTMSX vs. SWPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTMSX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund (BTMSX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTMSX achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than SWPPX's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, BTMSX has underperformed SWPPX with an annualized return of 1.83%, while SWPPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.


BTMSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.25%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
1.83%

SWPPX

1D
0.15%
1M
5.83%
YTD
11.69%
6M
11.71%
1Y
28.97%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTMSX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTMSX
Baird Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund
0.97%4.46%2.98%3.90%-4.01%0.59%2.90%3.81%1.34%2.45%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
11.69%17.87%24.96%26.26%-18.14%28.67%18.38%31.46%-4.47%21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BTMSX and SWPPX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.05

The correlation between BTMSX and SWPPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTMSX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTMSX
BTMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BTMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BTMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTMSX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund (BTMSX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTMSXSWPPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.69

2.52

+1.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.00

3.41

+2.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.26

1.46

+0.81

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

3.36

+0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.35

15.67

-3.33

BTMSX vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTMSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.69, which is higher than the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTMSX and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTMSXSWPPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69

2.52

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.85

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

0.86

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.51

+0.52

Drawdowns

BTMSX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTMSX drawdown since its inception was -6.51%, smaller than the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTMSX and SWPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTMSXSWPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.51%

-55.06%

+48.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.10%

-8.89%

+7.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.89%

-18.74%

+16.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.51%

-24.51%

+18.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.51%

-33.80%

+27.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

0.00%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.94%

-9.95%

+9.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

1.90%

-1.57%

Volatility

BTMSX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baird Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund (BTMSX) is 0.36%, while Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that BTMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTMSXSWPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

2.83%

-2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.84%

8.98%

-8.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10%

11.87%

-10.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.72%

16.93%

-15.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.84%

18.23%

-16.39%

BTMSX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTMSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTMSX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

BTMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than SWPPX's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTMSX
Baird Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund
3.07%3.05%2.93%2.48%1.36%0.88%1.30%1.66%1.53%1.43%1.17%0.00%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
0.99%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTMSX and SWPPX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWPPX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to BTMSX (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTMSX dropped -6.51% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

BTMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTMSX and SWPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer