PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTMKX vs. TIVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTMKX vs. TIVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) and American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund (TIVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTMKX achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than TIVFX's 35.02% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BTMKX having a 9.38% annualized return and TIVFX not far ahead at 9.60%.


BTMKX

1D
-0.28%
1M
2.62%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.25%
1Y
21.09%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
9.38%

TIVFX

1D
-0.78%
1M
4.70%
YTD
35.02%
6M
40.39%
1Y
66.67%
3Y*
26.44%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
9.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTMKX vs. TIVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTMKX
iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund
9.29%31.70%3.70%18.37%-14.04%11.30%8.07%21.96%-13.38%25.17%
TIVFX
American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund
35.02%36.15%3.73%15.43%-20.57%7.53%12.61%19.38%-19.87%24.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BTMKX and TIVFX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2011

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between BTMKX and TIVFX has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTMKX vs. TIVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTMKX
BTMKX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BTMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BTMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

TIVFX
TIVFX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
TIVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
TIVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTMKX vs. TIVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) and American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund (TIVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTMKXTIVFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

3.73

-2.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

4.52

-2.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.63

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

5.89

-3.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.54

21.60

-14.06

BTMKX vs. TIVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the TIVFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTMKX and TIVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTMKXTIVFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

3.73

-2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.59

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.55

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.40

-0.01

Drawdowns

BTMKX vs. TIVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTMKX drawdown since its inception was -33.92%, smaller than the maximum TIVFX drawdown of -54.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTMKX and TIVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTMKXTIVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.92%

-54.21%

+20.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-11.69%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.66%

-23.99%

+10.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.23%

-36.31%

+7.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

-41.51%

+7.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-2.02%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.77%

-13.38%

+5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

3.19%

-0.18%

Volatility

BTMKX vs. TIVFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) is 4.73%, while American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund (TIVFX) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that BTMKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTMKXTIVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

6.68%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

15.12%

-2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

18.51%

-3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

18.61%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

17.63%

-0.96%

BTMKX vs. TIVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTMKX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TIVFX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTMKX vs. TIVFX - Dividend Comparison

BTMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than TIVFX's 6.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTMKX
iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund
3.43%3.74%3.43%3.19%2.80%3.06%1.99%3.34%4.58%2.45%2.85%2.42%
TIVFX
American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund
6.53%8.82%10.23%1.66%1.39%3.65%0.34%1.69%1.37%1.28%1.57%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTMKX and TIVFX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIVFX has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to BTMKX (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTMKX dropped -33.92% vs TIVFX's -54.21%.

TIVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTMKX and TIVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer