PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTMKX vs. FINVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTMKX vs. FINVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) and Fidelity Series International Value Fund (FINVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTMKX achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly higher than FINVX's 7.12% return. Over the past 10 years, BTMKX has underperformed FINVX with an annualized return of 9.38%, while FINVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.57% annualized return.


BTMKX

1D
-0.28%
1M
2.62%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.25%
1Y
21.09%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
9.38%

FINVX

1D
-0.42%
1M
1.27%
YTD
7.12%
6M
11.57%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
13.25%
10Y*
10.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTMKX vs. FINVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTMKX
iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund
9.29%31.70%3.70%18.37%-14.04%11.30%8.07%21.96%-13.38%25.17%
FINVX
Fidelity Series International Value Fund
7.12%45.75%6.20%20.35%-7.21%16.39%4.87%19.85%-16.40%20.41%

Correlation

The correlation between BTMKX and FINVX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2011

0.96

The correlation between BTMKX and FINVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTMKX vs. FINVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTMKX
BTMKX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BTMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BTMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FINVX
FINVX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FINVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FINVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FINVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FINVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FINVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTMKX vs. FINVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) and Fidelity Series International Value Fund (FINVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTMKXFINVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

1.67

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

2.37

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.42

-0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.54

9.00

-1.45

BTMKX vs. FINVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the FINVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTMKX and FINVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTMKXFINVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.67

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.80

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.59

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.37

+0.02

Drawdowns

BTMKX vs. FINVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTMKX drawdown since its inception was -33.92%, smaller than the maximum FINVX drawdown of -42.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTMKX and FINVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTMKXFINVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.92%

-42.48%

+8.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-10.38%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.66%

-14.60%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.23%

-27.13%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

-42.48%

+8.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-1.47%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.77%

-9.04%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.79%

+0.22%

Volatility

BTMKX vs. FINVX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) and Fidelity Series International Value Fund (FINVX) have volatilities of 4.73% and 4.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTMKXFINVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

4.85%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

11.94%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

14.87%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

16.71%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

18.06%

-1.39%

BTMKX vs. FINVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTMKX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FINVX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BTMKX vs. FINVX - Dividend Comparison

BTMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than FINVX's 10.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTMKX
iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund
3.43%3.74%3.43%3.19%2.80%3.06%1.99%3.34%4.58%2.45%2.85%2.42%
FINVX
Fidelity Series International Value Fund
10.45%11.20%4.14%3.29%3.33%5.01%2.83%4.05%4.05%3.14%2.62%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BTMKX and FINVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FINVX has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to BTMKX (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTMKX dropped -33.92% vs FINVX's -42.48%.

FINVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTMKX and FINVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer